LaRouchePAC Live: National Town Hall Simulcast on the Western Drought Crisis · Saturday April 25, 2015

A PDF advertising this event can be found here.

California, along with most of the western states, faces the worst collapse of food production and population in our nation’s history—and it is not the drought. It is the Nazi policies of rabid free-market, Wall Street stealing, tied with the environmentalists’ depopulation agenda which is the problem, and nothing less than a complete rejection of both of these fascist policies will enable the U.S. to survive!

Join LaRouche PAC for a live national town hall meeting to discuss our emergency scientific program to end the water crisis, featuring speakers and audiences in California, Texas, and New York.

The live simulcast will feature presentations from former Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate of Texas, Kesha Rogers (left), LPAC Scientific Research leader, Benjamin Deniston, author of “New Perspectives on the Western Water Crisis” (center), and former candidate for U.S. Congress in California, Micheal Steger (right).

The scientific evidence presented by Benjamin Deniston of the LaRouchePAC Scientific Research Team irrefutably demonstrates the incompetence of Jerry Brown, Barack Obama, and the rest of the zero-growth fanatics.

The water exists—for California, for Texas, and for all arid regions—now we must have the political commitment to access it. Mankind is fully capable of managing and increasing the global water cycle to meet the needs for a growing population. This starts by realizing Earth’s water system is driven by solar activity and galactic cosmic radiation—a higher perspective which enables mankind to manage the water resources of our planet and atmosphere in a completely new way. Coupled with desalination and large-scale water transfer projects, we have the basis to address all of mankind’s water needs.

With this commitment, the new incoming Presidency must immediately reinstate Glass-Steagall and end the tyranny of Wall Street’s slave-based system. Second, we must put an end to all laws which violate the General Welfare principle of our United States, including and especially all laws which emphasize population reduction and so-called conservation.

With the restoration of the principles of Alexander Hamilton and our Constitution—a return to pro-growth, pro-science policies such as nuclear fission and fusion power, atmospheric water management, and space exploration—we will put an end to the fascist cycle of wars and destruction, and combine our efforts with those of China, Russia, and the other BRICS nations towards advancing global development.

End the Nazi Occupation, Burn the Bushes and Let the Water Flow.

Posted in Glass Steagall, water crisis | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

April 24, 2015 – Friday Webcast with Benjamin Deniston and Jeffrey Steinberg

Standing on the steps of World War III, the United States has the opportunity to, not only save the state of California from its current path of destruction, but the entire world by joining the BRICS group of nations. California’s BROWN or green future, and the hair-trigger-like potential for WWIII will be explored in tonight’s webcast.

Posted in Stopping WW III, water crisis | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Speech from Gerry Adams in response to Micheál Martin and Fianna Fáil

Building a New Republic

A chairde,

One year out from the 100th anniversary of the Easter Rising I am happy to be addressing Dublin Sinn Féin activists here in the city that fought an empire.

Bliain amuigh ó chomóradh céad bliain Éirí Amach na Cásca tá mé an-sásta a bheith ag caint libh, muintir Shinn Féin i mBaile Átha Cliath – an chathair a thug troid

The year ahead is a time for renewal and planning, a year for promoting republicanism.

The 1916 Proclamation remains the mission statement of modern Irish republicanism.

It is a freedom charter for this whole island and all the people who live here.

It is a declaration of social and economic intent for a society in which the people are sovereign.

And the Proclamation’s message of equality and citizenship is as relevant in 2015 as it was in 1916.

That is why we are campaigning so strongly for a ‘Yes’ vote in the forthcoming marriage equality referendum. This is fundamentally about equality of citizenship.

That is what genuine republicanism is about – a citizen-centred, rights based society.

Sin croílár an phoblachtánachais – sochaí a bhfuil an saoránach agus cearta lárnach ann

That is what Sinn Féin seeks to achieve.

Sin an rud atá Sinn Féin ag iarraidh a bhaint amach.

Next week the Fine Gael/Labour Government will make its Spring Economic Statement.

Working straight from the Fianna Fáil handbook, they will seek to buy the next election with tax cuts for the better off without changing the fundamentals of their conservative agenda.

But citizens will not be fooled that easily.

Ach ní bhuailfear bob ar na daoine chomh éasca sin.

Sinn Féin will judge next week’s Government statement on what it does to address the deep inequalities that have been wrought on this society over recent years.

Fine Gael and Labour claim that a recovery is underway.

If there is, it’s an unequal and unfair, two-tier recovery.

Sinn Féin wants to deliver a fair recovery.

A recovery that leaves no family behind.

A recovery where those who played no part in the economic disaster and who are least able to pay, are given a break.

The Government’s Economic statement is effectively the opening shot of its re-election campaign.

But the growing scandal about IBRC goes to the very heart of what is wrong with the governance of this State and the relationship between Government and big business, whether under Fine Gael or Fianna Fáil.

Fine Gael and Labour’s response to the issues around Siteserv and other scandals, their subservience to the elites, to the golden circles, is in marked contrast to their despicable attitude to citizens who have been impoverished by the politics of austerity.

The Taoiseach may duck and dive to avoid the scandal of Siteserve but it is clear that this is only the tip of the iceberg of the bigger scandal that is IBRC.

Sinn Féin will ensure that he does not escape his responsibility for this.

Meanwhile, Fianna Fáil Leader Mr Martin clearly prefers talking about Sinn Féin than about his own party, even at Fianna Fáil events.

Is it any wonder? There is growing political desperation within the leadership of Fianna Fáil at the growth of Sinn Féin right across the island of Ireland.

Fianna Fail were in government for 60 years in this State.

Bhí Fianna Fáil i rialtas sa Stát se ar feadh seasca bliain.

The Fianna Fáil leadership knows that with every advance of genuine republican politics, their own failure to deliver on republican principles, is further exposed.

Sinn Féin is seen by ever greater numbers of citizens as representing a genuine republican alternative to the failed politics which Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Labour have inflicted on citizens.

By attacking a vibrant and growing party like Sinn Féin, Mr Martin hopes to make himself politically relevant.

He concentrates more on us than he does on this very bad Fine Gael/Labour Government.

The reason for this is obvious.

Fianna Fáil has no strategies of its own.

It has no strategy to end the austerity which has had such a devastating effect on hardworking families and vulnerable citizens.

Under Mícheál Martin, Fianna Fáil has no vision for the future and instead offers the same, tired old rhetoric of the past.

In government the Fianna Fáil leadership wrecked the economy, forced hundreds of thousands out of work and more into exile in Australia, Canada and elsewhere.

It was the policies of Fianna Fáil which created the mess for the thousands of households who have either lost their homes or are in mortgage arrears.

It was Fianna Fáil which brought in the Troika, acquiesced to their demands, and gave €64 billion of taxpayers money to the banks.

The present Government is implementing an austerity agenda which was laid out for them by Fianna Fáil, including Micheál Martin.

The Water Charges, for example, were Fianna Fáil’s idea.

Micheal Martin was a senior government minister for 14 years.

He voted for budget after budget, which disproportionately impacted on working families and the most vulnerable and supported the use of taxpayers money to pay private bad bank debt.

The idea of a ‘Fianna Fáil Nua’ is a myth – it is the same old Fianna Fáil and if that party was in government today it would behave exactly as it did in the past.

It’s also inconceivable that someone who sat at Cabinet from 1997 through to 2011 can in any real way lead the opposition.

Ní raibh sé chomh soiléir is atá sé anois nach bhfuil pioc difir idir Fianna Fáil agus Fine Gael.

Micheál Martin’s recent tirade against Sinn Féin at Arbour Hill majored on negativity and invective.

It offered no message of hope for citizens or policy proposals which could build a better future for this country.

His claim that Sinn Féin is not ‘fit for government’ is an example of the arrogance of the old Fianna Fáil.

With a leadership that believed that its own interests came before the interests of the country or the interests of the people.

That delusion and that arrogance still infects the current Fianna Fáil leadership.

Ach beidh mé an-soiléir faoin méid seo.

The question of who represents citizens in government is one for the people to decide – not Fianna Fáil and not Micheál Martin!

Unlike Fianna Fáil, Sinn Féin has a mandate in both parts of this island.

We are in government in the North where we have been central to the transformation that has occurred there in recent years.

The Fianna Fáil leader is singularly ill-informed on the Six Counties but this has not stopped him making regular but constantly negative verbal forays into matters north of the border.

What was especially interesting and disturbing about Micheál Martin’s recent utterances was his departure from the wide, pro-Good Friday Agreement consensus that has existed across this island in recent years.

Mr Martin consciously sought to denigrate the political institutions in the North and to erect new barriers to Sinn Fein’s full and equal participation in the Executive.

I think people need to know if Micheál Martin still supports the full implementation of the Good Friday and subsequent Agreements.

I also want to encourage Mr Martin to organise Fianna Fail in the North. Fine Gael should do the same. And Labour.

Despite what Mr Martin claimed last weekend, Sinn Féin has never tried to claim ownership of 1916.

The only people trying to claim 1916 in a narrow, party political way is the Fianna Fáil leadership.

What Sinn Féin has sought to do is to popularise the centenary of the Easter Rising.

We have sought to place the ideals of 1916, and above all the message of the Proclamation, front and centre in all the commemorative events.

The legacy of 1916 belongs to all the people of Ireland, North and South.

Is le muintir na hÉireann ar fad, idir Thuaisceart agus Dheisceart, oidhreacht naoi déag a sé déag.

Sinn Féin seeks to implement the republican and egalitarian message of the Proclamation. That is what conservative parties like Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael don’t want to talk about.

Micheál Martin has also raised the hoary old myth of there being a ‘good old IRA’ of 1916 and the Tan War which he tries to contrast with a ‘bad IRA’ of the 1970s, ‘80s and ‘90s.

Of course Mr Martin conveniently ignores the reality that the Volunteers in 1916 were responsible for killing women and children in the streets of Dublin.

That the IRA of the Tan War era was responsible for abducting, executing and secretly burying suspected informers.

He tries to sanitise one phase of war and demonise and criminalise another one.

Let there be no doubt about it. All war is terrible. War is desperate.

Those of us who lived through the recent conflict are the ones who have worked to ensure that conflict is ended for good and that we never go back there.

That is why Sinn Fein was pivotal to the Peace Process.

Those of us who come from communities that were ravaged by conflict; those whose neighbours were killed; those who buried our friends and family members; who carry injuries to this day; those who endured the prisons, do not need lectures from Micheál Martin about conflict.

We did not go to war. The war came to us.

The obligation on political leaders is to work to resolve conflict and to build reconciliation, not to attempt to re-fight the war.

Mr Martin needs to wake up and realise that the war is over!

Arís, tá an cogadh thart!

Micheál Martin’s selective diatribes on Irish history convince nobody.

We are as a proud of Bobby Sands and Mairéad Farrell as we are of the Volunteers of 1916 and those who fought the Black and Tans.

For decades Fianna Fáil posed as ‘the republican party’ while wielding power in the interests of visitors to the Galway Tent as opposed to those of ordinary hardworking citizens.

But there now exists a genuine and growing Irish republican party focussed on uniting Ireland, and bringing about a real republic on this island.

The Fianna Fáil leadership has strayed very, very far from the party’s republican origins.

No one is more disappointed by this than those disillusioned Fianna Fáil voters – good nationalists and republicans – who worked for decades for the party only to be betrayed by corrupt leaders.

As we can see, Micheál Martin and Fianna Fáil are very, very worried.

There are 500,000 reasons for them to worry – they are the 500,000 Sinn Féin voters across this island.

But Micheál Martin and Fianna Fáil are not really afraid of Sinn Féin – it is the electorate they fear.

For our part, Sinn Fein will not be deflected from the political task that lies ahead.

Our responsibility is to ensure that if there is to be a recovery it must be a fair recovery.

Our duty is to rebuild and repair society.

To build equality and to continue to realign Irish politics so that the economy serves the citizens.

To build an unstoppable momentum for positive political change across this island.

To unite our country and our people in harmony and mutual respect

And to build a genuine republic with equality and social justice at its core.

Let us go out and continue that work.

Anois rachaimid amach agus leanaimís ar aghaidh leis an obair sin!

Go raibh míle maith agaibh.

Source: Sinn Féin Newsroom

Posted in Ireland | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Obama Murders

Thousands of people are dying in the Mediterranean trying to flee the horror created by President Barack Obama’s criminal wars across the North Africa and the Middle East, leaving nations like Libya, Syria and Yemen in chaos under terrorist gangs backed by America’s “ally” Saudi Arabia. An estimated 3,000-5,000 people are crowding into boats every day, willing to die at sea rather than live in the Hell created by Obama’s insanity.

In discussion with the LaRouchePAC Policy Committee earlier this week, LaRouche emphasized:

“Not only do we have the drownings in terms of the Mediterranean coast, on a massive scale, but we also have, to complement that, we have from California in particular, we have a threat of depopulation, massive depopulation, from California on the United States. What this indicates is, that we have, typical, a global trend in certain parts of the world, especially, to reduce the population drastically. And includes not only the coast which Obama actually created by his reign of terror in North Africa, but has been flooding the waters of the Mediterranean with mass drownings, of people desperately fleeing away from the reach of the protégés of Obama.”And you see the same thing is happening in California, but we know it’s not limited there. We know there’s a trend throughout the United States in particular and as in this Mediterranean region, that there’s mass extermination of the human population is under way. And what we’re seeing in what is happening in the mass drowning and similar things in the Mediterranean coming from Africa, and what we’re seeing as threatened in California, are the same thing: The scheme under the support of particularly, the currently President of the United States, Obama, and this genocide policy which is reflected by the policymaking of Obama among others, is what faces mankind now.”

President Barack Obama admitted Thursday morning to killing three more Americans in January in drone strikes on the Pakistan-Afghan border area. In speaking to the press, he expressed “tremendous sorrow” that two Western hostages—American Dr. Warren Weinstein, a USAID worker held by al-Qaeda since 2011, and Italian Giovanni LoPorto, held since 2012—had been killed in one drone strike.

He did not mention, however, that two additional Americans had also been killed in these raids. That was left to a statement released by the White House yesterday morning, which described Americans Ahmed Farouq and Adam Gadahn as “fighters” for al-Qaeda, and expressed no regret, nor gave any excuse for the President of the United States killing Americans on his own volition without following explicit Constitutional due process requirements. The White House statement claimed they had not been personally targeted, but only showed up among the dead in a drone attack on an al Qaeda camp. Obama insists that he has the right to determine who is a terrorist and who is not, and to kill anyone he wants to, along with whoever happens to be with them.
Lyndon LaRouche has stated that the world is now closer to global thermonuclear war than anytime in modern history, driven by Obama’s support for a Ukrainian regime which has restored the Nazi battalions which fought alongside Hitler in World War II, committed to a war on Russia, while also supporting al- Qaeda linked terrorist groups in Syria, Yemen, and elsewhere, and fully supporting the Wahhabist regime in Saudi Arabia which created and funds these terrorist groups.

The powers of Wall Street and the City of London are faced with the collapse of the derivative bubble, now far larger than it was before the 2008 collapse due to Obama’s subservience to the too-big-to-fail banks. The coming Greek default, the collapse of the oil patch speculation, or a number of other sparks could blow out the entire system. A revolt is growing within the Democratic Party against Obama and his controllers, as potential Presidential candidate Martin O’Malley has launched a war on Wall Street, demanding the restoration of Glass-Steagall, while he and others are standing up to Obama’s effort to ram the TPP through Congress, denouncing it as a “race to the bottom” which does not facilitate trade, but undermines sovereignty of those foolish enough to join it—including the U.S. itself.

But they must stop the madness now, before economic collapse and war decimate the world population, by ending Obama’s murderous reign of terror, removing him from office now.


Top US, Russian Retired Generals: “How to Avert a Nuclear War”

The world is on the verge of thermonuclear World War III. The reasons usually given for the confrontation between the US and Russia are bullshit. Rather, there are some people who intend for this to happen. “We are on the verge of virtual extinction, as the result of chain-reaction effects” of the madness of the British Empire and their Wall Street lackies faced with the end of their bankrupt system, Lyndon LaRouche said on April 21. Their failure to surrender their weakening grip on power, will drive them, in desperation, to have Obama launch World War III. “This is the first threat of human extinction in modern history,” LaRouche concluded.

Former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. James Cartwright, and retired Russian General Vladimir Dvorkin, warned, in an April 19 op-ed in the New York Times entitled “How To Avert a Nuclear War,” against one highly likely scenario for how World War III might happen. Cartwright, prior to joining the Joint Chiefs, was commander of US Strategic Command. Dvorkin, in a long career that spanned from 1958 until 2001, played a key role in the 1960’s development of Russia’s submarine-based nuclear deterrent, and later in the strategic arms talks of the 1970’s. These are two men intimately familiar with the strategic nuclear forces of their respective countries, including the command and control systems over those forces.

In their op-ed, Cartwright and Dvorkin proposed that both the US and Russia should eliminate the launch-on-warning concept from their nuclear strategies. They note, at the outset, the increasing strategic tensions between the US and Russia—tensions that diplomacy has done little to ease. “This makes it all the more critical for Russia and the United States to talk, to relieve the pressures to ‘use or lose’ nuclear forces during a crisis, and minimize the risk of a mistaken launch,” they write. “The fact is that we are still living with the nuclear-strike doctrine of the Cold War, which dictated three strategic options: first strike, launch on warning, and post-attack retaliation.” From there, they focus their attention on launch-on-warning, for which the potential of an accidental launch, or a launch based on false information, is very high,— aggravated by short warning times and Russia’s compromised warning systems (Russia currently has no operating early warning satellites, depends only on ground-based radar systems). As a result, the timelines, they write, “are very compressed and the opportunities for ill-considered decisions very real.”

“This risk should motivate the presidents of Russia and the United States to decide in tandem to eliminate the launch-on-warning concept from their nuclear strategies,” they write. “They should reinstitute military-to-military talks, which were suspended over the Ukraine crisis, to pursue this stand-down as an urgent priority.” Such talks, however, are very unlikely as long as the insane Barack Obama is president of the United States.

“In periods of heightened tensions and reduced decision times, the likelihood of human and technical error in control systems increases,” they conclude. “Launch-on-warning is a relic of Cold War strategy whose risk today far exceeds its value. Our leaders urgently need to talk and, we hope, agree to scrap this obsolete protocol before a devastating error occurs.”

Now you can’t say that you weren’t warned.

Russian Defense Ministry Ridicules U.S. State Spokesperson Lies, Accuses U.S. of Training Troops for Urban Assaults

The Russian Defense Ministry official representative, Gen. Igor Konashenkov, said Thursday that Moscow hoped the Department of State would be rid of its status as a whirlpool of absurd declarations after the former spokesperson, Jen Psaki, quit her position, TASS reported yesterday.

“However, we were mistaken, since the claims voiced by the new spokesperson, Marie Harf, about the concentration of the highest amount of Russian air defense systems in eastern Ukraine since August, again astonish us with the level of their incompetence,” General Konashenkov said.

Marie Harf claimed earlier that the increasingly complicated nature of training courses for the Donbass separatists “leaves no doubt that Russia is involved” — i.e., as usual, the claims of troops, tanks, air defenses, etc. come with no effort to provide any evidence.

General Konashenkov joked: “The Russian Defense Ministry will not be surprised if it hears one of these days that Russia is accused of rolling out a strike group of aircraft carriers in the Lugansk region, or of an illegal entry into the First City Pond in Donetsk by a Russian nuclear submarine.”

He said such statements aim to stir public commotion ahead of the NATO summit, due in Antalya on May 13-14.

He added, however, that the very real concern is that the U.S. training of Kiev troops, which began this week, is on the storming of buildings in urban districts, and is taking place “in the areas adjoining the zones of conflict in Mariupol, Severodonetsk, Artyomovsk, and Volnovakha,” despite claims to the contrary from Washington.

Sen. Schumer: Your Wall Street Friends Are the Currency Fixers

Reports about the April 19 IMF report featured the warning of a general debt blowout if Greece leaves the euro, or the Federal Reserve raises interest rates too soon or too fast. But the report also contained a highly unusual and important admission: The biggest London banks have been running a trillion-dollar “carry trade” speculation into China, violating that country’s regulations and attempting to manipulate its currency, the yuan.

To take one exemplary story about the IMF report, that of Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in the London Telegraph April 20: “Borrowing in dollars outside the U.S. has surged from $2 trillion to $9 trillion over the past 15 years [due to Bank of Japan and Fed quantitative easing—ed.]. Half of this is now concentrated in emerging markets…. It includes at least $1.1 trillion of loans to Chinese companies, much of it through Hong Kong, and intended to circumvent China’s internal credit curbs. It is now clear that many banks and investors have been engaged in a currency “carry trade,” betting — wrongly, as it now turns out — that the dollar would weaken against the yuan.”

Much could be said about this in regard to why there are real estate and commodity bubbles in the Chinese economy.

But what is most relevant is that all of the trans-Atlantic governments, at every G7 and G20 meeting of this century, have relentlessly demanded that China allow the value of the yuan to rise, backed by tirades on the subject from members of Congress and European parliaments and from nearly all trade unions, chambers of commerce, etc.

It turns out, that they were all screaming at China, all that time, to support the City of London banks’ Hong Kong carry trade speculations, which required for their super-profitability that the yuan keep rising in value. Under that international pressure China did allow the yuan to rise, slowly but steadily, for years.

But the government of Xi Jinping reversed that policy in 2014, in order to finally enforce its own currency-control policies, which Evans-Pritchard referred to, against the operations of the London banks in Hong Kong.

Result: London and Wall Street speculations “reversed,” and big banks lost money. Result: Now some Congressional Democrats object to Obama’s Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) swindle, not so much because it is an attack on the United States, but that it is not enough of an attack on China. Like New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, they say they oppose the TPP; but, they might vote for it if accompanied by a “currency manipulator” designation on China.

Tell the truth, Senator: It is your “constituents” in Wall Street boardrooms, led by their more clever London counterparts, who have been manipulating China’s currency, along with rigging international interest rates, foreign exchange markets, gold prices, etc., etc. That has ended with the emergence of the new policy of the BRICS. Obama’s TPP is part of an attempt to provoke war with China and Russia. Oppose him.

Posted in Impeach Obama, Stopping WW III | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

LaRouche: Obama is a Disease Disguised as President; Remove him now!

In discussion with the Policy Committee on Wednesday, Lyndon LaRouche stressed that Obama is pushing a policy of genocide as can be seen in the mass drownings of refugees in the Mediterranean Sea, the policy in California of Jerry Brown to commit genocidal depopulation by sabotaging the development and exploitation of new water resources and in his ongoing campaign of confrontation with Russia and China which is leading to thermonuclear war.

All of these policies reflect a commitment to reduce the world’s population drastically.

Take the Mediterranean. It was Obama who waged an illegal war to topple Qaddafi in Libya by backing the Al-Qaeda affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and the Muslim Brotherhood under the guise of the so-called Responsibility to Protect (R2P). It was Obama who then spearheaded the campaign to topple Assad in Syria, thus resulting in the spread of ISIS. It is Obama who is insisting that the legitimate government of Libya negotiate with the terrorists in Tripoli, whom he put in power.

As LaRouche said, Obama created a reign of terror in Northern Africa and throughout the region which has resulted in thousands of human beings desperately attempting to flee Obama’s proteges, whom Obama personally empowered and protects.

Desperate human beings are now paying the terrorists Obama put in power in Tripoli in hopes of escaping certain death under ISIS, only to drown en masse in the hulls of modern day slave ships on the Mediterranean Sea.

As Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov said today in a Moscow radio interview, Obama’s receipt of a Nobel Peace prize in 2008 was followed by a series of “absolutely illogical wars.” As Lavrov pointed out, Obama won’t even agree to place ISIS on the UN list of terrorist organizations, because he would then have to admit that Isis has emerged as a result of the actions of the US in Iraq first under Bush and then under Obama.

Syria’s President Assad was even more forceful in an interview on France2 TV, stressing that ISIS was created by the Americans starting with Bush in 2006:

“I’m not in Iraq and I wasn’t in Iraq, and I wasn’t controlling Iraq. The Americans controlled Iraq, and ISIS came from Iraq to Syria…. ISIS has expanded in Syria, in Iraq, in Libya, in the region in general…. The coalition against terrorism cannot be formed by countries who support the terrorists at the same time.”

The policy Obama has unleashed now reflected in mass drownings in the Mediterranean, is the same NAZI policy being carried out by Obama’s ally Jerry Brown in California. The purpose is to kill people.

If you put these two pictures together, as Mr. LaRouche suggested, what is clear is that mankind is faced with a genocide policy.

Didn’t Lyndon LaRouche warn from the very beginning that Obama’s so-called health care policy was the same thing? — Deliberate genocide through rationing.

Put these two examples together with the fact that Obama is pushing for thermonuclear war. This expressed intention to launch a thermonuclear war against Russia and China, is an integral part of the same policy.

Anyone who thinks otherwise is just wrong. They have been talked into accepting something, based solely on popular opinion, which has no validity. They know nothing.

We on the other hand are right.

The evidence is there for anyone with active intelligence. Do not accept the opinion of anyone who supports Obama.

Obama is a disease disguised as President.

What we are seeing today is a real form of Nazism coming from the Trans-Atlantic community.

What we are doing in Manhattan and California, however, shows that we are able to turn the tide. The intelligent section of the population of the United States, the patriots, especially above the Mason-Dixon line, are not disposed to capitulate to Obama’s Brownshirts.

What we have seen in the recent period is that we are able to engage citizens who don’t want this crap. If they have a leadership, if they see resistance, they will respond.

Our job is to beat these Nazis, starting with the removal of Obama from office, and save civilization.

If you look at the forces now in motion throughout Eurasia, the NAZI enemy is outnumbered. Or, as Shelley put it in the Mask of Anarchy: We are Many; they are few.

As LaRouche stressed, we just have to get the numbers better organized.


Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov on Obama

In a radio interview Wednesday with three radio stations, Ekho Moskvy, Sputnik, and Govorit Moskva, as reported by TASS, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said of Obama:

“There were many hopes for Obama; there was the Nobel Peace Prize but a lot of wars followed, which were absolutely illogical and did not meet the interests of stability in certain regions.”

Lavrov also stated that the United States is unwilling to acknowledge that the Islamic State has emerged as a result of Washington’s own actions:

“We have proposed putting the IS on the list of terrorist organizations compiled by the UN Security Council, but the Americans have refused to do that,” Lavrov said. “They said this is not a separate organization but the same as al-Qaeda.”

Lavrov said that this position is easy to explain:

“They do not want to admit that the IS has emerged as a result of their actions in Iraq,”

he said, pointing out that that al-Qaeda is also the result of the U.S. actions.

Debate on ‘Who Started the Libyan War’ Rages in Italy

While a decision is expected by the emergency meeting of EU government leaders on April 23 (the first one since 9/11), the recent refugee tragedy is spurring a debate in Italy on: 1. What to do immediately? 2. What to do in the long-term? 3. Who is responsible for the mess in Africa?

Hardly anyone objects to the assertion that a standard of rescue operations must be re-established, which should at least be equal to the Mare Nostrum operation. Mare Nostrum allowed Italian ships to save human lives regardless of whether they were in international, Italian, or Libyan territorial waters. Mare Nostrum cost EU9 million per month, entirely financed by Italy. Triton has been funded with EU3 million per month.

The Renzi government is also pushing the “go and destroy” policy, i.e., sink the smugglers’ boats, which on one side won’t prevent smugglers from getting vessels elsewhere, and at the same time runs the risk of producing collateral damage to innocent people.

The real issue is how to eliminate the two roots of African emigration: war and poverty. On one hand, the Libyan state must be rebuilt, and on the other side, capital must be invested to develop those countries. Nothing on this can be expected from the EU, as it would mean getting rid of British geopolitics, challenging London and Obama and the financial markets.

However, there is a lot of resentment in Italy against the Anglo-French coalition that initiated the Libyan war, and the Obama administration which has backed it. Everybody knows that Washington is currently backing the pro-terrorist factions in Tripoli and thereby making any political solution impossible.

A preferred target of attacks is former French President Nicholas Sarkozy, “who had the gall to inform his allies that he had given the order to attack, after his bombers had taken off,” as the weekly Panorama writes.

“Does anyone remember Sarkozy, Cameron and Erdogan’s triumphant speeches in 2011 in Benghazi?” asks Il Sole 24 Ore strategist Alberto Negri.

And the conservative daily Il Foglio even calls for “Bringing Sarko la Racaille to the UN Court,” using the term “racaille” — vermin, riffraff — that then Interior Minister Sarkozy used to characterize the immigrants who rioted in the French suburban slums, the banlieues.

In Great Britain, UKIP MEP Nigel Farage issued a scathing attack on Cameron and Sarkozy, as reported by the Daily Telegraph, which asked whether a “stronger Europe” wouldn’t help solve the problem. He shot back, “It was the European response that caused this problem in the first place. The fanaticism of Sarkozy and Cameron to bomb Libya. They have completely destabilized Libya, to turn it into a country with much savagery, to turn it into a place where for Christians the place is now virtually impossible. We ought to be honest and say we have directly caused this problem.”

Syria’s Bashar al-Assad Roasts France, Western Governments for Arming Jihadists, Creating ISIS

In an interview with France2 on April 21, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad delivered a stinging denunciation of France and other Western governments for their material support for the jihadists—the nonexistent “moderate opposition”—and for creating the chaotic conditions in the region which led to ISIS’s emergence.

Responding to France2‘s hostile and provocative interviewer, David Pujadas, who quoted “analysts” charging that it was Assad who helped ISIS emerge, Assad shot back that ISIS “was created in Iraq in 2006 under the supervision of the Americans. I’m not in Iraq and I wasn’t in Iraq, and I wasn’t controlling Iraq. The Americans controlled Iraq, and ISIS came from Iraq to Syria, because chaos is contagious.” When there is chaos in a certain country, he continued, “this is a fertile soil for the terrorists to come. So, when there is chaos in Syria, ISIS came to Syria. Before ISIS, came al-Nusra Front, which is al-Qaeda, and before that you had the Muslim Brotherhood. They all represent the same grassroots for ISIS to come later.”

The Syrian President repeatedly debunked Pujadas’s assertions that the Syrian army uses chemical weapons, chlorine gas, barrel bombs, etc. returning to the central point that the intervention of Western nations created the conditions for ISIS’s creation. Look at the air raids carried out by the 60-nation “coalition,” he said. Syria is a small country, but “what we do is tenfold sometimes, than what they do in one day. Is that serious?…they’re not serious so far. And the other proof is that ISIS has expanded in Syria, in Iraq, in Libya, in the region in general. So how can you say it was effective? They’re not serious, that’s why they don’t help anyone in this region.”

The point is, he emphasized, “the coalition against terrorism cannot be formed by countries who support the terrorists at the same time…they send weapons to the same terrorists under the title of ‘moderate opposition’…So, this is a contradiction. It doesn’t work.”

Al-Assad reserved his harshest words for the French. In response to Pujadas’s asking al-Assad whether he takes any responsibility for what’s happened in Syria in recent years, Assad replied “thing are not absolute… Everybody has a responsibility. We have our own problems in Syria…but now I’m talking about what brought ISIS here: the chaos, and your government, the government—or if you want to call it regime—the French regime, as they call us, is responsible for supporting those jihadists that they called the moderate opposition.”

As for his willingness to engage in dialogue with France, Assad stated, “We’re always interested in dialogue with anyone, but that is based on the policy. How can we make dialogue with a regime that supports terrorists in our country, and what for?… When they change their policy, we’ll be ready to make dialogue….” Assad made a point of noting that Francois Holland is the most unpopular president in the history of France since the 1950s.

When Pujadas mentioned that the French Prime Minister had denounced Assad as a butcher, Assad caustically replied, “the statements of the officials in France, no one is taking them seriously now, for one reason: because France is a satellite somehow to the American policy in the region; it’s not independent, it doesn’t have the weight, it doesn’t have the credibility.” He underscored that he was interested in what Syrian people think, not the French.

Posted in Impeach Obama, Stopping WW III | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New Paradigm Show · April 22, 2015

Do you know where the weather and climate which determines life on earth comes from? Most people don’t, including today’s so-called “experts.” Join us for our weekly discussion with the LPAC Science Team.

Posted in water crisis | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Obama is the Detonator for World War

Developments over the past several days provide a devastating reminder that, so long as Barack Obama remains in office as President of the United States, the world stands on the edge of general war, a war that could quickly become a war of thermonuclear extinction.

The issue is not Obama per se. He is a degenerate patsy of the British Empire and allied Wall Street forces that are currently being driven mad by the reality that their entire trans-Atlantic financial system is doomed, and that an alternative paradigm, centered in the China-Russia led BRICS emerging system, is coming into being. The forces who have owned Obama, since they launched his political career, are ready to start World War III, rather than surrender their power.

Lyndon LaRouche warned on Tuesday that “we are on the verge of virtual extinction, as the result of chain-reaction effects of this situation.” The refusal of the British and Wall Street to surrender their failing grip on power will drive them, in desperation, to have Obama launch World War III. “This is the first threat of human extinction in modern history,” LaRouche concluded.

He further observed, that the mere fact that Obama has not yet been removed from office, is the clearest warning that the leading American circles, and the American people as a whole, do not any longer possess the temperament to stop this disaster from occurring. Remove Obama from the presidency, and the danger is removed. The British will remain hysterical over the imminent demise of their empire, but they will be rendered powerless to act. The bankruptcy of the trans-Atlantic system means the death of the British Empire.

Russian vitality has returned, and China is emerging as a friendly, but dominant force in Asia, promoting a policy of win-win cooperation among all of the nations of the region and across Eurasia. This alone is driving the British wild.

It is vital to comprehend the motives behind the war danger. The day-by-day events are merely markers of that process—warning signs along the road to potential doom.

The Fourth Moscow International Security Conference, held over the last weekend, made clear that Russian leaders clearly understand the imminent danger of thermonuclear war. It was the dominant theme of the major conference presentations by Russia’s Defense Minister Shoigu, Foreign Minister Lavrov, and Chief of the General Staff Gerasimov. The audience and speakers list included the ministers of defense of all of the key Eurasian nations: China, India, Iran, Pakistan, North Korea, Greece, Iran, Indonesia, Mongolia, Serbia, and Belarus, plus South Africa.

Lavrov made clear in his remarks that the US and NATO deployment of the anti-ballistic missile systems to areas bordering on Russia constitutes a threat of a first-strike attack on Russia. President Obama had claimed that the ABM systems were directed at Iran, and that the deployment would be re-assessed if a P5+1 deal on Iran’s nuclear program were to be reached. Now that such a deal is within reach, Obama has refused to scale back or cancel the ABM deployments, which will place vital components of the missile defense shield in Romania and Poland, right near the Russian borders.

In addition, the Obama Administration is expanding its Global Strike Command, to incorporate both conventional weapons and strategic nuclear weapons. In addition, the Administration is developing a new generation of tactical nuclear weapons, to be forward based in Europe and deployable on long-range stealth bombers and drones, armed with cruise missiles.

The situation in the Persian Gulf, where the same Saudi forces that ran the original 9/11 attacks against the United States—attacks that have been covered up by two successive Presidents, Bush and Obama—are engaging in a population war against neighbor Yemen, claiming that Houthi rebels in Yemen are surrogates for Iran, is another flashpoint for imminent war. When the original P5+1 breakthrough was announced at the beginning of the month in Switzerland, LaRouche warned that the agreement would be a trigger for war—unless the Saudis were smashed. Instead, Obama joined forces with the Saudis in the bombing campaign against Yemen, over the strong objections of the US military, led by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Central Command.

As the Gulf of Aden filled with Saudi and American warships, over the past 72 hours, including the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, and Obama threatened actions against Iranian commercial vessels, en route to Yemen, intense pressure from the US military and other circles led the Saudis to announce a halt to their bombing campaign late Tuesday. Earlier in the day, King Salman had put the Saudi National Guard on alert for possible ground operations across the border into Yemen. The circumstances of the last-moment freeze in operations is still to be sorted out, but the fact remains that the region was headed towards a “Gulf of Tonkin” type provocation for general war, that was only halted at the last moment.

The doom of civilization is not inevitable. But it is virtually a certainty unless Obama is removed from office. He is the detonator for world war, and his prompt removal is the only legitimate war-prevention option at this late date.


How Many Nuclear Options Does the US President Need?

Last week, Air Force Maj. Gen. Garrett Harencak, assistant chief of staff for strategic deterrence, told a Congressional committee that the Air Force needs both penetrating bomber capability to drop gravity bombs on nuclear targets and a long-range cruise missile so that bombers can fire nuclear weapons at targets from distances of 1,500 to 3,000 miles away, well outside of enemy airspace. He argued that having both capabilities “vastly, vastly complicates a potential enemy’s defenses and most importantly gives options that we would perhaps someday wish we had if we don’t pursue this.”

The problem with all of this, Washington Post veteran national security columnist Walter Pincus points out in a column Sunday, is that it will cost an enormous amount of money to achieve, and it won’t even all be available until the mid-2030’s. That’s not even counting all of the missiles in silos and on submarines, all of which also need to be recapitalized for hugely more amounts of money. What’s driving the bomber side of this, though, as Pincus points out, is a loop hole in the New START treaty: air-launched weapons are not counted separately under the treaty, only the bombers are. The US has roughly 90 B-52’s and B-2’s that are counted under the treaty, but the up-to-a-dozen nuclear bombs and missiles that each can carry are not. This is also true for the Russian side, but Pincus’s point is, that, despite Obama’s pledge to work for a nuclear-free world in his 2009 Prague speech, the US is getting no closer to that goal.

Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Frank Kendall, also testifying before a Congressional committee, last week, provided some details as to just what the costs of nuclear force modernization will be. Even without sequestration, the Pentagon will need an additional $10 billion per year for modernization of all of those bombs, missiles, submarines, and bombers.

“I frankly think the only way we can address it and keep the force structure in the Department of Defense that we would like to have is higher budgets,” he said. “I really don’t right now see any management solutions that will help us.” Secretary of Defense Ash Carter has put together a Pentagon group, the Strategic Portfolio Review, to look at ways to address the funding shortfall and nuclear modernization, reported Defense One last week. Total cost of the program that the Pentagon wants could add up to as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades.

That cost, Pincus suggests, of providing some future US president with the option of attacking some future enemy with either gravity bombs or air-launched cruise missiles, may be just a bit too much.

Saudis Called a Halt to Indiscriminate Bombing of Yemen

Saudi Arabia’s King Salman ordered the Saudi Arabian National Guard, widely regarded as the Kingdom’s best-equipped military ground force, to get ready to take part in Riyadh’s campaign against the Houthi rebels in Yemen. Riyadh, ostensibly under pressure, has announced an end to airstrikes. A Defense Ministry statement quoted by the country’s news agencies said the objectives of Operation Decisive Storm have been achieved and the Saudi authorities are halting the nearly four-week-old, indiscriminate bombing campaign in Yemen.

Although the call-up of the Saudi National Guard, and the arrival of the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt to join seven other U.S. warships in the area, indicated a Saudi-U.S. plan to escalate the war further, earlier in the day Tehran’s Tasnim news agency had quoted Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian as saying, “We are optimistic that in the coming hours, after many efforts, we will see a halt to military attacks in Yemen.”

What exactly transpired in the interim period has not been revealed yet. However, beside Iran’s proposed UN Resolution seeking an immediate ceasefire, Riyadh was also under pressure from various international aid groups that had criticized the Saudis for the indiscriminate airstrikes and for the enforcement of a rigid embargo that has been starving the Yemenis of food, water, fuel, and medicine. Officials at the World Health Organization in Geneva said today that Yemen’s health services have collapsed. They said the cumulative reported death toll since the Yemen fighting escalated last month was at least 944, with nearly 3,500 wounded.

According to US intelligence sources, the Pentagon had opposed the U.S. support for the Saudi bombing campaign from the outset, but had been overruled by “political considerations” at the White House. Between the backlash against the civilian casualties from the Saudi bombing; the growing danger of a new “Gulf of Tonkin” incident in the Gulf of Aden, with Iranian commercial ships heading towards Yemen and Obama threatening to board and search them for weapons; and the politics of the upcoming Obama-Gulf Cooperation Council summit at Camp David, the U.S. generals were able to renew the pressure for the halt to military operations.

Posted in Stopping WW III | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment