TRUE LAW WAS NEVER A MATTER OF ANY RULER’S MERE OPINION
Mankind has usually been in trouble, often in peril, as under both the original oligarchical principle of the Roman empire, and by the present continuation of that empire under the guise of the British monarchy. The trouble of the United States itself, today, as knowable to most among us presently gathered for this discussion, has been, usually, as it had been under a most contemptable wretch, U.S. President Andrew Jackson, now nearly two centuries ago. The trouble, now as then, has been caused, chiefly, by what has been mistakenly accepted, if not in name, but as fact, as British imperial (i.e., financial) law, still under the intrinsically foolish belief in mere money as such. Sometimes, there have been practical reasons for enacting such laws among the populations of nations: often, that has been the custom whenever mankind has known no better. Unfortunately, often, what passes for law is, all too often, and much too long, when under the influence of what has already been an imperial law in its characteristics, as far too long under the imperial rule of a law which has been systemically malicious in the very bones of its intention.
Despite the continuation of that ugly custom this far, there have been some precious exceptions. Two among the exemplary works of modern law typify those who did really qualify for prescribing that which still meets the standard for truly natural law. Such were the precedents set by Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa, as represented in his De Docta Ignorantia, as also in the case of Cusa’s avowed student, the Johannes Kepler who expressed this law in terms of vicarious hypothesis. It was expressed, similarly, as metaphor, as by Shakespeare. Johann Sebastian Bach, like his own “disciples,” too, was a valid lawmaker in his musical principles. True law was never, and will never be, a mere matter of anyone’s official, or other craft of mere opinion; only truly universal principles which qualify as true principles, as Cusa’s principle of creativity did, and as I shall illustrate that case in the course of this present report, principles which are actually relevant in true science, as in truly Classical art.
Otherwise, in the merely common practice of nations, very little of the presently knowable law has been truly worthy of the characterization as that of “universal law,” the which had been truly worthy of the characterization as “universal law” in its making. Most so-called law among nations, unlike that of our original U.S. Federal Constitution, has been merely “made up,” without much truly better quality of its composition than “sloppy,” in its efficient evidence; as, even most among the Presidents and laws of our United States have failed to meet the requirements of what should have been recognized as the systemic principles of that Constitution’s original intention. The failed results, according to the evidence bearing on the quality of the evidence of customary law-making presented from history, have been more often clearly wrong, than even passably useful.1
Nonetheless, that once said, there is, in principle, a still rare, but readily accessible, notional principle of truly universal law. The problem has been, that the general practice conducted by nations in the name of law, is outrightly wrong, or simply foolish. Take, for example, the cases of Roman law and its presently intended continuation under the world–wide-ranging empire of the Queen of England: both of those cases from history have been merely arbitrary forms of hereditary concoctions, at best, and they have been, more often purely evil, than not. On the current record, that Queen’s (actually oligarchical) custom in law, is fairly measured as not only wicked in the sense of “systemic,” but, presently, when considering the recent results for mankind globally, her law has been the worst sort of wickedness. Nonetheless, despite all those bad things, good law, if it existed, is always urgently needed, but has been all too rare, heretofore.
Meanwhile, I, for one, would demand what would be rightfully termed “natural law,” if our citizens had actually remembered what true natural law might be. For example: without the presently immediate passage of a renewed passage of President Franklin Roosevelt’s “Glass Steagall” law, the planet as a whole would now be immediately collapsed into a massively deadly ruin, or worse, world-wide. Only a few moments stand between now and world-wide Hell. Those persons who are of an opinion contrary to that, are now catering to the almost immediate mass-extinctions among the institutions and populations which they currently pretend to represent; they have, thus, hung the rope of their own bad law around their own foolish necks.
The apparent principle for what might be defined as “knowable law” in any meaningful sense, is to be located generally within the inherently evolving domain of what is an implicitly living, stellar array of its own, also living expression. Then, next, there is a generality of life as we have become accustomed to know it as living, for example, on Earth. Next in the order to be considered, is the noetic expression of the qualities and the powers uniquely specific to the category of human life.
The most immediate consideration, which is specifically required for the functions expressed by mankind, must be awarded to the unique power of the human will to organize a general process of ceaseless increase of the relative energy-flux-density of the modes of progress of mankind which must be awarded to the unique power of the human will to organize a willfully general process of the increase of the relative-energy-flux-density in the modes of progress of mankind, a progress which must be summed up as ready to exert a more powerful organization of the universe which mankind is enabled to inhabit: all this, as measurable per-capita, and per unit of standard for energy-flux density,
The most common human mistake in choosing of opinion and related elements of practice of mankind, has been the false presumption, that the organization of the processes within the Solar System are to be defined by an action of human sense-perception (e.g. “the senses) as such.
To come, now, to the most crucial quality of law to be emphasized, the true law of the universe which can become presently known to exist, by us, is knowledge which is more readily known to be premised less on mere sense-perceptions as such, than upon the principles of human, actively noetic creativity per se. It is of particularly, exceptional importance for us, considering the state of the Solar System presently: first, the landing on our moon, and then, human-controlled apparatus operating, suitably, for our needs on Mars: that we redefine law to fit the requirements implicitly existing with the nearby regions of the Solar system, such as the regions of asteroids from the vicinity below the orbit of Venus, to that above the orbit of Mars.
The Remainder Of Our Century2
We had already been made aware of the actually great threats to the life of mankind on Earth; but, the currently general opinion had been: “Practically, there is little we could do about known threats from within other parts of the Solar system” (and, to some degree, beyond that).” The general, actually foolish attitude had been, that we were best advised to cease thinking about such realities which might be lurking “out there.” Today, official opinion among the general populations and governments of the Transatlantic region, has been returned to the habits which are not dissimilar to those from a the time when the Mediterranean region of the planet had adopted the popular opinion typified by such silly presumptions as that “The Earth is flat.” Nonetheless, the world-outlook of what could have been presumed to be intelligent Europeans, had been largely abandoned to copying presently what amounts to certain similarities to the spirit of a legendary, brutish, “Flat Earth” mythology of the Fourteenth-century populace, instead of what had been a Fifteenth Century “Golden Renaissance.”
Since the successful birth of our United States, until that period of “World War I” which had been prompted and unleashed by the sudden, 1890 ousting of Germany’s Chancellor Bismarck, there had followed the rather immediately successive aftermaths of “World Wars I and II.” Consequently, the society of Europe, and that of our United States, has been moving “backwards,” overall, into what is presently an immediately threatened “New Dark Age.” This is a New Dark Age which had been set into motion by the lunacy of returning to the British monarchy’s launching of a generality of warfare unleashed by the combined effects of the assassinations of U.S. President John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert: e.g., the repeated defeat, by a corrupted U.S. Congress operating under the orders of the British Prime Minister, against U.S. President Ronald Reagan’s repeated sponsorship of a U,S, Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI),
We are now being plunged into the very political depths of “a new dark age,” the same which had, as I have said, had been actually launched by the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and of his brother Robert. That effect had emerged clearly, and now more fully, with the massive corruption represented by that same “Gramm Leach Bliley” corruption of the U. S. Congress, which had led into the current state of virtual national bankruptcies under Presidents George W. Bush, Jr, and, now, Barack Obama.
Since the Eighteenth-century “Peace of Paris,” the United States has never been more successfully ruined by no other human enemy, as much as by the British empire, or by the related agents of our republic’s enemies, including a number of those persons and institutions which have mis-served as our U.S. Presidents in their time. The ultimate, most serious enemy of the United States, the British empire-in-fact, has operated against our republic not merely through the British monarchy, but also through the influence of those frankly British imperial banking and related institutions which had become traditionally centered in New York City’s Wall Street, as this swindle was defined most clearly by the role of the U.S. traitor and traditional British spy, Aaron Burr, the same Burr who controlled the Presidencies of Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren, that done under a corruption typified by all but a few of the U.S. Presidencies during the course of the Nineteenth and Twentieth Century, and through all of the Twenty-First century this far.
The key to understanding the mechanisms of U.S. traitors and their likenesses, is to have been to see the repeated effects at the overthrow of those U.S. Federal Constitution’s founding principles of law of economy, principles which were defined by both the genius and the role of U.S. Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, as those principles were restored, for a time, largely through the combined efforts of U.S. Presidents James Monroe and John Quincy Adams. At a still later time, President Abraham Lincoln, while he had still lived, had returned the United States to those principles which had been the rebirth of the essential intention of Presidents Washington, Monroe, and Lincoln, respecting the Hamiltonian principles of national economy, rather than that anglophile hoax of “monetarism” which has once again dominated U.S. Federal practice increasingly since the assassination of John F. Kennedy. The assassination of that Kennedy, is now still key to understanding both the monstrous stupidity in the launching of what General Douglas MacArthur had denounced as the intention for a post-Kennedy, intended “Vietnam War,” and in the promptly consequent decline of the U.S. economy into its present state at the brink of sudden disintegration, had deeply relevant precedents.
President Abraham Lincoln, who had emerged toward U.S. national leadership status through his association with John Quincy Adams, and, who emerged as a U.S. President of true greatness in world history, echoed by another notable echo of greatness, that of a President William McKinley who was also promptly assassinated, and thus replaced in office by the treasonous, anglophile asset Theodore Roosevelt, as by the Ku Klux Klan fanatic, that President Woodrow Wilson who had echoed the faction of “Teddy” Roosevelt, and would be succeeded by Calvin Coolidge, and, later, Herbert Hoover, and, after the death of President Franklin Roosevelt, the scoundrel Harry S Truman, After the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the retirement of President Lyndon Johnson, there were also later manifestations of a veritable “new venetian” models, such as Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, George H. W. Bush, his son George W, Bush, Jr., and, now, Barack Obama, who conclude the collection of the morally failed specimens from what is fairly derived as “the anglophile editions, ”this far.
All among those I have listed as errant Presidents had been committed in their practice to principles directly contrary to the specifically American principles of Alexander Hamilton, without whose role the U.S. Constitution would have become a disastrously failed economic system from the outset. Each of all among the inherently failed Presidents, were each essentially monetarist products of incompetence in matters of economy, whereas the competent Presidents and candidates constituted the list of the set of economists who based their practice efficiently on Hamilton’ prnciples of the science of physical economy, rather than the decadents’ swindle known as monetarism. All of the economies of Europe recently, for example, since the late 1960s, for example, have been the consequence, lately, of bunglers, or worse, hoping that the formerly competent economists would be doomed to be steeped in their own frustrations.
Consider a few relatively crucial examples of the economic-policy issues to be considered.
Since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, no President of the United States, this far, has shown any actual competence in the actual principles of a practice of the applied science which must be recognized as a physical economy: all of those have been merely monetarists respecting the actual principles of a practically competent notion of a science of physical economy. President Ronald Reagan is a special case, a subject on which I command some very significant insight into the Franklin Roosevelt legacy, a legacy must take carefully into account in approaching the subject under discussion in this location.3
That legacy of Franklin Roosevelt can be identified with John Quincy Adams, as it was expressed under that Adams’ protege, Abraham Lincoln, and passed along a line of political-economic heritage which ran, during my own lifetime, from Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in opposition to the legacy of the scoundrels of the anti-Franklin Roosevelt version of an Anglophile legacy of Prescott Bush and his tribe, and, therefore, also, the wretched Wall Street maven, Truman.
I have been definable personally as an economist, in the most appropriate sense of my leading national and global accomplishments as an economic forecaster, and as a part of an expression composed of a certain set of trends which emerged from my war-time, and immediate post-war experience taken from what corresponds to a special sector from what had been the World War II aftermath. The relevant facts of this matter had become clear to me, as I look at the evidence in retrospect. That fact is, that my acquired, deep allegiances converged in “leanings” toward “a certain stripe” of World War II veterans who tended to converge, in global outlook, on a particular set which had emerged from the period of a certain quality of range of type of the veterans of war-time experiences which found themselves converging, in a special way, on what was to emerge around what would come to have been the Presidency of Ronald Reagan. The gathering together around those who, by experience, rallied against the fast trend-lines toward a rabidly pro-anglophile thermonuclear-warfare, combined with a population-control bent, emerged around a vision of a hatred of everything which lean toward the evil by the circles which Bertrand Russell represented, The cases of Douglas MacArthur, Dwight Eisenhower, Charles de Gaulle, John F. Kennedy, and the latter’s brother, Robert, were united in a converging deep resentment, and even consequent hatred against everything which the inherently crooked anglophiles of “the Wall Street Bush League” represented.
Personal experience with some mountain-climbing for scientific purposes, had helped considerably in shaping the emergence of my certain distinct sort of outlook, as in my coming out of the World War II and post-war experiences. It is an experience with symbolic implications, but also very much organic. Consider this recurrence of a similar approach to the experience since the “Dark Age” of the Fifteenth Century, especially the trans-Atlantic experience typified by the circles rallied around the great ecumenical Congress of Florence from the time of Nicholas of Cusa and its consequences for the role of the great trans-Atlantic revolution associated with the interlinked names of Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa and the voyages of Columbus. It is the approach consistent with the notion of the ontological integrity of “the process of becoming.”
To the present day, the post-Roman empire tradition in Europe, has been centered in a deep, persisting conflict between the very much still-becoming of the legacy of the Roman empire, through its continuation as the Roman empire, an empire which reemerged as the Venetian system, such as that of Modena, brought out of the old Roman oligarchy from the time of the Caesars, and continued through the New Venetian system’s rebirth as the British empire. For the British empire spawned by the “New Venetian” family of William of Orange, and those of the respective Peace and Treaty of Paris, the birth of the North American constitutional republic, was something “to be assimilated” after a temporary interruption. The victory of the United States under the tradition of Alexander Hamilton’s design for a revolutionary quality of national economy, was something the Roman-New Venetian empire of the British and Austria had never imagined to occur, and which they would never accept, to the present date. Hence, from the ouster of the pro-American Otto von Bismarck, to the present date, the return of the world, by the present British Queen, from a world population of seven billions persons, toward approximately an early one, presently, is essentially the marker of a return to the original Roman empire’s intended world empire.
Thus, the current course of history lies now, in an urgent need for a certain new awareness, that of our habitation, not as a mere planet, but of a certain region of the Solar System, and, prospectively, beyond that. Whereas, the British empress in London, of today, demands turning back the clock, at a wildly accelerating pace, toward a new stone age, or even worse, What she demands, is a form of world-wide bestialization, or, probably, the “green” virtual extinction of the human species itself.
It is against such background, that the deeper meaning of Alexander Hamilton’s achievement becomes understandable, that, appropriately, in terms of a supra-historical outlook. Let us come to that point, step-by-step, as now follows.
The secret of economic science now turns our attention to what is fairly identified as that great folly, “The Myth of Money.” In reality, money, as such, never had an intrinsic, true value all its own. The only clearly intended function performed by money, is the effect of adopting it, itself, as used in place of the reality of the biological quality of the physical-mental effect of the productive process, or the lack of that process, itself.
The conception which I now present here, may seem, for the present moment here, to be simply comparable to matters within the domain of the “animal kingdom,” or the like. Nonetheless, the truth of the matter is, that the effect of the existence of the human species, lies essentially, always outside the bounds of life within the animal kingdom so-called. Monetarism practiced in the domain of society, is a pernicious and acute disease, a disease like that which turns men into swine, an affliction commonly expected to be found among cannibals and oligarchs, but which has nothing in common with the principle of humanity as such, excepting in reducing humanity to a mere prey of predators in the form of oligarchs such as the true Satan also known as that true incarnation of pure evil, the Olympian Zeus of his time.
In fact, the distinction of beast, from human, is fairly proven to be an absolute distinction of man from beast. The distinction lies, intrinsically, in what are properly defined as the noetic powers, unique (to our present practical knowledge) to the members of the human species, if we know none of an absolutely superior quality inhabiting this Solar system. Indeed, the irony of oligarchical reign, is that oligarchs
of the known world, such as those comparable to the British monarchy, have been. like the Henry VIII’s masters, the Venetian beasts who used him as a predatory beast, rather than as a man. In fact, the Venetians are nothing better than Roman imperial criminals in the likeness claimed for the Olympian Zeus, Roman oligarchs who had fled from their monstrous sins in a ruined Rome, for a time, into the fabled swamps of the upper Adriatic, a place where, according to their inherently satanic quality of spiritual principle, they (and their future British imperial heirs) fancy themselves as reigning, still, today.
I, for one, do not share their evil opinions. Nor did the Alexander Hamilton who was far beyond anything of the miserably oligarchical nature of Wall Street and its high-ranking financial puppets, such as Aaron Burr and his treasonous, Wall Street likenesses of the earlier and present time. As the British empire of today attests in practice, the only outcome of a continuation of the Olympian legacy today, would be the presently early extinction of a human species which submitted still to the Olympian tyrannies reigning still today.
What I have just written here, is the only presently available truth about the current politics of the world at large. Now, translate those actual facts into contrast to the mere matter of money.
“Paper money” is most useful for the current discussion of the issue at hand here, in light of the fact that (next to the absolutely fraudulent merely paperless money of Ben Bernanke) Wall Street and comparable utterances of merely fictitious, “Wall Street” and the vast, intrinsically hyper-inflationary, “quantitative easing” frauds of Ben Bernanke and the Barack Obama fictions: the truth is that no form of mere money ever had any truly physical-economic value in-and-of-itself.
There was never any truth in “bail-in;” “bail-in” was never anything other than pure larceny, without any other basis in economy than nakedly oligarchical forms of sheer theft: break the undefended jewelry store over night, and let the proprietor wonder in the morning.
Alexander Hamilton was one among a relatively mere few who understood the relevant realities to be actually taken into this account of the difference of man from beasts.
That much said in my opening of this present chapter of this report, now shift your attention to focus upon the matter of the explicit form of principles involved.
To understand the principles of combined growth and progress, the principled combination on which all competent economic policy-shaping depends, we must begin with recognizing a strict distinction of a principle separating human intelligence from the natural behavior of all non-human living species from the so-called “animal kingdom.”
All competent economic practice, therefore, begins with a strict separation of the actual economy, in its distinction from what is otherwise non-human life. In fact, there could not be a competent theory of economy, without the specifically noetic characteristics which distinguish the inherent function of the human mind, absolutely, from all other presently known forms of life.
To understand economy competently, we must first identify the absolute principle of difference of human economy from the behavior of non-human life. Take note of the fact of the difference between living and non-living processes, and, then, identify the absolute difference in the known characteristics of behavior of man from that of that of the beasts, Do some people behave as actual beasts? Of course! The crucial task confronting us at this stage of matters at hand, is to focus on specific characteristics of all of that animal and plant life which is systemically absent from the principle of life which inherently defines the noetic functions specific to the human mind, as distinct from all other presently known forms of life.
That sought, foremost distinction of human life from all other known forms of life, is the human species’ power to effect willful increase of the quality of the energy-flux densities, which, in the case of the human species, is the systemically functional distinction of the qualitative leaps upward, into willfully chosen higher orders of magnitude of “energy-flux” density, orders which correspond to the efficient equivalent of a rise from a relatively lower species of mankind, to a higher order of the species of mankind. Human existence, when it occurs in a useful form, signifies the occurrence of leaps into higher orders of energy-flux density, hopefully from generation to successive generation.
The foremost distinction of human life from all other forms of life, is the human species’ power to effect willful increases of the quality of energy-flux densities, which, in the case of the human species, is the systemically functional distinction of the qualitative leaps upward into higher orders of “energy-flux density.” which correspond to the efficient equivalent a rise from a relatively lower species, to the equivalent of an higher order of species through intellectual, rather than evolutionary, means.
Any human culture which adopts a so-called “green” direction for its development, presents us with a case of what is, effectively, a reversed direction, downwards, toward lower qualities of species–comparable, intellectual, or biological performance, even relative depravity of the human species. Such forms of degeneration of a culture within the human species, leads, inherently, toward deeper degeneration of the minds of the men and women who accept the likeness of the “green policies”currently demanded by the current British monarchy. Under present circumstances of the known aspects of the inner planets of the Solar system, any of those which we sometimes name, currently, as “greenies,” set a standard which corresponds, intrinsically, and willfully, as belonging to a lower biological category of willfully unfit to continue to exist in their chosen modality as that of a sub-species type.
The required choice of terminology for such cases, can not be classed as anything but “failed.” The evidence here is “inherently scientific.” That signifies a reference to the history of extinct species of what had been living types: as evolution among emergent classes of living species is properly dominated as upward-development-directed. That is not merely an trait of “species,” but is inherent in the process of “natural selection” of known past species excepting the case of the human species. In particular, the challenge of human species-survival and closely-related considerations, includes such factors for consideration as a required rate of the species’ increase in potential relative productivity, as this is to be measured in per-capita rates of upward-directed change in required rate growth of “energy-flux density,” relatively to changes in the energy-flux density in the increase of the Solar system and related factors in the galaxy.
In turn, the failure to increase the energy-flux density of life on Earth, and in comparable cases, predetermines a decline in the ability of living species, as, specifically, the human species, both on Earth, and within such bounds as identifiable factors within the Solar system. In fact, the human species’ ability to survive, must be estimated in terms of the increase of the energy-flux density f anyyor the relevant culture of the human species in its relatively required pre-conditions of existence. In brief, if we could not successfully “colonize” human mastery of the intent for human occupation of Mars at some relevant future time, we must consider the human species as relatively an intellectual failure.
Mankind has been in trouble, often in peril, as under both the original oligarchical principle of the Roman Empire as continued by the implicity quasi-planetary British monarchy presently. I remind us, that the trouble of the United States itself, as knowable to most among us presently, has been, usually, as it was under that contemptible wretch, U.S. President Andrew Jackson. The trouble has been caused, chiefly, by what has been mistakenly accepted as (actually British imperial, financial) law , as today, under the intrinsically foolish rule of mere belief in money as such.
Sometimes, there had been, necessarily, practical reasons for enacting such laws among the human populations of nations. Usually, that has been the custom whenever man has known no better: which has been often. Often, unfortunately, what passes for law, is all too often the effects of imperial law in its characteristic expressions, which has always been the systemically malicious factor in the very bones of its intention.
Despite the continuation of that custom this far, there have been some precious exceptions, Two among the exemplary modern lawmakers typify those who did really qualify for prescribing that which meets the standard of truly natural law. Such were Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa, as represented in his De Docta Ignorantia, and in the case of Cusa’s avowed student, the Johannes Kepler who expressed this law in terms of vicarious hypothesis. It was similarly expressed as metaphor, as by the work of Shakespeare. Similarly, Johann Sebastian Bach, had demonstrated the principle of metaphor in such expressions as his set of Preludes and Fugues. Bach was, like his own true disciples, also a valid lawmaker. True law was never, and will never be a mere matter of anyone’s merely official, or other craft of mere opinion; only truly universal principles could qualify as true principles, as Cusa’s principle of creativity did, and as I shall illustrate that case in the course of this present report.
Otherwise, in the merely common practice of nations, very little , even none of the presently knowable law has been truly worthy of the character of “universal law” in the process of its making. The U.S. Federal Constitution’s original intent as expressed in a crucial way by which Alexander Hamilton overcame that systemic error whose correction made possible the survival of the original U.S. Federal Constitution in its original making.
Most law of nations, unlike that of our original U.S. Federal Constitution, has been merely “made up,” that according to peculiar tastes of the makers,” without truly better than very sloppy evidence, Even even most among our U. S. Presidents and the laws of our United States, have usually failed to meet the requirements of what should have been recognized as that original Constitution’s essential invention. The failed results, when considered in accord with the true evidence, have been, customarily, according to the evidence presented as if from lessons of history, have been more often wrong, than even barely useful.4
Nevertheless, that much once said, there is, in principle, a still rare, but readily accessible, notional principle of truly universal law. The problem has been, that the general practices presented by nations in the name of law, are often not only wrong or are simply foolish. Take, for example, the cases of the Roman law and its intended continuation under the cases of the Roman law and its intended continuation under the world-wide-ranging empire of the Queen of England, for an example. Both of those two cases from history have been, more often, purely evil, than not on the current record; the current Queen’s (actually oligarchical) custom in law, is fairly to be measured as not only wicked in a systemic sense of matters; it is presently the worst of wickednesses, considering the recent results for mankind globally. Nonetheless, despite all those bad things, good law, if it existed, were always, urgently needed; but that has been, heretofore, all too rare.
The proofs of what I have just now, summarily presented, thus, can be known presently, and the contrary known either as simply wrong, customarily silly at best, or an evil as such, I, for one, would demand that what would be rightly termed “natural law,” if our citizens had actually remembered what the true nature of what true natural law might be.
For example: without the presently immediate passage of a renewed Benjamin Franklin Roosevelt’s “Glass Steagall” law, the planet as a whole would now be immediately collapsed into a deadly ruin, almost immediately. Those of contrary opinion, have sought, wittingly, or otherwise, their own very early personal extinction of the institutions which they have claimed to represent; so, they would have hung their own bad law around their own virtual necks.
One most troublesome irony in the current domain of belief in science, is the systemic nature of the irony which attends the credulous belief in the effect of human reliance on the naive practice of attribution of “self-evidence” to human sense-perception as such. Is the existence of God Himself merely a “self-evidence of bare sense-perception”? The logic of a customary argument would appear to make God himself merely the ultimate expression of a presumed “absolutely fundamental law” of a bare principle of sense-perception! Or, is sense-perception itself not merely a matter of a shadow cast by higher-reigning principles of our universe at large?
Does that take away from us anything which is actually known to be true about the universe, otherwise? Is the entirety of the still popular human conceit respecting “sense-selfishness” not merely a science-ignorant man’s petty ego-trip? Is the universe we experience merely a shadow cast by a human individual’s ego-trip? Were it not prudent to consider that the universe (e.g., the Solar System) might have contained, in some fashion, the generation of the faculty of animal sense-perception?
Were it not evident, in fact, that the irony of the argument I have just stated here, lies within the failure of the critic to recognize the distinction of the noetic powers of the human species from the beasts? True, the typical human individual known to us in Europe and the Americas today (in particular) does not recognize the evidence to the effect that the human mind, when functioning in its normal state of matured development, does have the ability of efficient foresight of a type absent for inferior species of life, on precisely this account. All of the problem is what the oligarchical principle demands dumbed-down members of the inferior ranks of society.
Therefore, let us now proceed as follows.
The apparent principle for what might be defined as a body of “knowable law,” in any meaningly sense, is to be located generally in the evolution of an inherently evolving domain of the implicitly living stellar array in its own (also) living expression on that matter. Then, next, there is a generality of the implicitly (also) living expression. Next in the order to be considered, is the noetic expression of the qualities and powers uniquely specific to human life.
The most immediate consideration, one which is specifically required for the functions of mankind, must be awarded to the unique power of the human will to organize a general progress of ceaseless increase of the relatively energy-flux density of the modes of progress of the relative energy-flux density of the modes of progress of mankind which must be summed up as ready to exert a more powerful organization of the universe which mankind inhabits, as this is measurable per-capita and per standard of energy-flux density. That must be a suitable view of our universe which is to be enabled to inhabit, either directly, or otherwise. There are other, related considerations, but those which I have stipulated this far, will be sufficient to report forthe present moment here.
Probably, the most common human mistake in the choosing of opinion and related practice by mankind, has been a false presumption: the presumption that the organization of the processes within the Solar system, are to be identified by the action of human sense-perception (e.g., “the senses”) as such.
To bring matters to the most crucial law to be emphasized here, is that the true law of the universe which can be presently known, by us, to exist, is knowledge which is readily known to be premised on the principles of human, willfully noetic creativity, per se. It is of particular, exceptional importance, considering the state of the Solar System now, that we define law to fit the included requirements implicitly existing within the nearby regions of the Solar System presently: first, the landing on our Moon, and, then, human-controlled apparatus operating, suitably, for our needs, on Mars.
We had already been made aware of the actually great threats to the life of mankind on Earth: but, the current general opinion had been: “Practically, there is nothing much which we could do about known threats from within the Solar System” (and, to some degree beyond). The general attitude had been, that we were best advised to cease thinking about such realities which might be lurking “out there.” Now, official opinion among the populations and general governments of the Trans-Atlantic regions of the general populations, has returned to the habits of a time when the Mediterranean region of the planet had adopted the popular opinion that “the Earth is flat.” Nonetheless, the world-outlook of what could have been presimed to be intelligent Europeans had largely abandoned the legendary, brutish “Flat Earth” mythology of the Fourteenth-century populace, for a Fifteenth-century “Golden” Renaissance.
With the successful birth of our United States, until the period of the “World War I” whcih had been prompted and unleashed by the sudden, 1890 I ouster of Germany’s Chancellor Bismarck, and the immediate aftermath of “World War II,” the society of Europe and the United States, has been moving backwards and downwards into a now immediately threatened “New Dark Age,” a “New Dark Age” set into motion by the lunacy of returning to the British monarchy’s launching of a general warfare unleashed by the combined effects of the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and of his brother Robert, the Indo-China warfare, and the repeated defeat, by a corrupted U.S. Congress operating under orders of a British Prime Minister, such as the later, evil Tony Blair, against President Ronald Reagan’s sponsorship of the U.S. Strategc Defense Initiative (SDI).
We are presently being plunged into the very depths of a “new dark age,” one which had been officially launched, actually, by the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and, a bit later, his brother (and presented Presidential pre-candidate) Robert. Those effects emerged clearly, and now fully, with the crooked actions of a largely bought-and-paid-for U.S. Congress’s implicitly treasonous scheme of Gramm Leach Bliley hoax-swindle, the bought-and-paid-for Congressional repeal by the U.S. Congressional repeal of the President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Glass-Steagall law, a bought-and-paid-for repeal by the U.S. Congress, which was imposed at the close of a battered President William Clinton’s turn in office, ata the close of the 1990s.
The United States had never been successfully ruined, since the Peace of Paris, by any other human enemy then the British empire, or by the related agents of our republic’s enemies,. including a number of those persons and institutions which had operated against our republic some of which had actually served even as U.S. Presidents in their time. The ultimately serious enemy of the United States, the British empire-in-fact, has operated against our republic, that done through the British monarchy, but also through those British banking interests and related agencies originally controlling the United States’ policies through those British imperial banking institutions traditionally poised within the U.S. region New York City’s Wall Street, as that long-standing swindle was defined clearly by the role of the British spy Aaron Burr’s top-down direction of the U.S. Presidents Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren, and by their successors in similar roles.
The key to understanding the role of U.S. traitors and their like, it must be seen in the overthrow of the principles of the U.S. Constitution’s founding principles of law for economy, as that is specified, in design, by the role of U.S. Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton, as those principles were nearly restored, largely, through the combined efforts of U.S. Presidents James Monroe and John Quincy Adams. Later, President Abraham Lincoln restored what was to be considered a “fair working model” of the intention of the original Federal Constitution’s economic principles; later, President William McKinley, while he lived, as moving in that direction. However, Presidents Theodore Roosevelt, (Ku Klux Klan refounder) Woodrow Wilson, the ugly personality of Calvin Coolidge, pompous swindler Herbert Hoover, Harry S Truman, Richard Nixon, and Jimmy Carter, were either simply catastrophic failures, or outright scoundrels such as George H. W. Bush, his son George W. Bush, Jr., and the worst among them all to present date, Barack Obama.
Each and all among those errant Presidents, had been committed, in their practice, to principles directly contrary to the specific principles of Alexander Hamilton, without which, the U.S. Constitution would have been a disastrously failed economic system from its outset. The contrary, inherently failed Presidents were each committed, in their own implicitly treasonous practice, to principles directly contrary to the specific principles of Alexander Hamilton, without which latter the U.S. Constitution would have been failed economic system from the outset. The inherently failed U.S. Presidents were each, essentially, monetarists, rather than the economists who based themselves efficiently on the principles of physical economy, rather than monetarism. All of the economies of Europe, for example, have been lately bunglers, at their very best, since the middle through closing years of the 1960s and raw beginnings of the earliest 1970s
Monetary theory and its practice, are always directly at odds with the physical realities of a competent form of national economy. Nominally “successful economists” have been often considered such by those who are essentially swindlers, not as producers of physical-economic growth on a national scale. Monetarisms, as such, are essentially either clever or simply brutish thieves, or, we might suggest, pitiably or otherwise wretched bunglers.
That much said in continuing this chapter thus far, now shift your focus, this time to the matter of the explicit physical principles involved.
To understand those principles of growth on which all competent economic policy-shaping depends, we must recognize a strict distinction of principle separating human intelligence from the natural behavior of all non-human living species. All competent economic practice, begins with a strict separation of the principles of actual economy in its distinction from what is, otherwise, human life. In fact, there could not be a competent theory of economy, without the specificallt noetic characteristics which distinguish the inherent function of the human mind from all other presently known forms of life.
To understand economy competently, we must, first, identify the absolute principle of difference of human ecnomy from the behavior of non-human life. Take note of the fact of the difference between living and non-living processes, and, then, identify the absolute difference in known characteristics of behavior of man from that of beasts. Do some people behave as if they were beasts? Of course! The crucial task confronting us at this stage of matters at hand, is to focus on specific characteristics of all that animal and plant life which is systemically absent from the that principle of life which inherently defines the noetic functions specific to the human mind, as distinct from other known forms of life.
The foremost distinction of human life from all other forms of life, is the human species’ power to effect a willful increase of the quality of energy-flux densities, which, in the case of the human species, is the systematically functionally distinction of the qualitative leaps into higher orders of magnitude of “energy-flux density,”
Up to the completion of the preceding chapter of this present report, the subject had been premised on the standpoint of an Earth-based challenge. Now, we shift emphasis to the mapping of the domain of action within the Solar space marked out according to the characteristics of what composes the relative asteroid belts and other subjects inclusive of the region between the ranges of the asteroid belts from those associated, relatively, of Mars into Venus. The associated presumption for this purpose, is a dedication to increasing emphasis on the development of a “traffic system” within that volume operating with increasing emphasis on leading roles of the use of thermonuclear fusion propulsion among targeted destinations on planets, moons, and asteroids. That array is to be presumed to feature increasing emphasis on both keystone selections of useful asteroids (for communications, defense, and offense) with a strong emphasis on adjusting the ironical limitations on Mars-Earth communications presently.
As it has been pointed out in studies by the Basement Team, stress the fact that the planets of the volume of the notional space within which the Solar system is operating, presents us with a present choice of image in which the planets and their moons of that system are presently implicitly targets for what is being “shot against them” at relatively very high speeds across long spans of relatively lapsed time, which must, in fact, be resolved for the “rough factor” of equalizing the acceleration/distance factors of pre-mapping of choice of distance/destinations/impacts/defense.
The feasibility of such a pilot program within that domain, will obviously depend upon increasing the rates of increase of energy-flux density employed. That should be readily understood to signify a program of development within (and beyond) defined by an intended rate of increase of the per-capita energy-flux density, as if per-capita, which is to be assigned within the context of a rate of increase per capita, assigned to each of typically four sectors of development per century relative to Earth’s civilization.
Obviously, that mission is to be defined in terms of the mapping of generated and applied potential; it must represent a constantly higher level of relative “charge”(“action”) per marked point of the overall process.
Implicitly, this means the effect of increasing the rate of relative increase of charge within which the rate of applied advances (within the expanding intensity of the field are to be situated) In other words, increase the potential of the field, while raising the potential operating within the field. In principle, this represents a relativistic kind of mission-orientation in policy: accelerate the stream, and accelerate the stream within that stream: “flow with the go.”
That is nothing really so new as it might seem to some. That is the tendency demonstrated by the progress of mankind from the simple fireside of the aboriginal “cave man,”with his simple fireside, through successively higher levels of energy-flux density.