LaRouche: “If Obama is blocked, World War III, started by the British, will not function”

The British Empire’s demented drive for global
thermonuclear war, most recently using the Ukraine theater as a
fulcrum, has been stymied over the last 48 hours, Lyndon LaRouche
commented in discussions with associates this morning. But the
stalemate emerging from the April 17 quadripartite Geneva
agreement, is highly unstable. The British Empire’s war drive
will either be derailed by removing Obama from office, or it will
again escalate rapidly towards thermonuclear confrontation, this
time with direct involvement of the British Empire in such a
gambit.

“The entire operation so far, is now stalemated,” LaRouche
stated. “Which means the next stage is: the British Empire moves
in. Which means, Australia, and other points in the Middle East,
and trying to pull the United States in. But if they can’t pull
the United States in, it ain’t going to work! Without the United
States, they cannot start a Eurasian war.

“So it’s an interesting situation. That’s the stalemate. The
British are not in a situation to declare war, unless they can
get the United States to push it through, and there are blocks
right now.”

LaRouche then took note of the pressure Obama is coming
under because of a Florida judge’s decision to compel the FBI to
release 92,000 pages of documents relevant to Saudi financing of
activities related to 9/11; and he underscored the strategic
significance of the Kesha Rogers campaign for the Senate from
Texas, which can blow open the entire situation in the Democratic
Party nationally, to good effect.

The crucial issue which Russian President Vladimir Putin has
used to gum up the works on the war drive for the moment,
LaRouche explained, is that the neo-Nazi squadristi–which the
British and Obama intentionally put in the driver’s seat in their
illegitimate Ukrainian government–must be disarmed and
demobilized, as part of the Geneva agreement. “Putin put
something in very clearly, on the question of the conditions, in
terms of Ukraine,” LaRouche said. “That there has to be no
thuggery continued in Ukraine. That’s where the block is. And
Putin says, there’s no giving in on that, that these guys have to
surrender their guns.”

Meanwhile, the eastward expansion of NATO up to Russia’s
borders continues, with reports of the possible forward-basing of
some 10,000 American troops in Poland, and similar deployments.
In his four-hour April 17 press conference, President Putin
denounced this eastward expansion of NATO–which occurred despite
early 1990s promises from the first Bush administration that this
would not happen–and commented: “If we don’t do anything,
Ukraine will be drawn into NATO sometime in the future. We’ll be
told `This doesn’t concern you,’ and NATO ships will dock in
Sevastopol, the city of Russia’s naval glory.”

Putin also issued a blunt warning: “Let me remind you that
the Federation Council of Russia gave the President the right to
use the Armed Forces in Ukraine. I very much hope that I will not
have to exercise this right and that, through political and
diplomatic means, we will be able to resolve all the pressing, if
not to say burning, issues in Ukraine.”

Those remarks of Putin’s have been widely covered in the
West. But what has been almost totally blacked out are his
comments at the same press conference, warning that the U.S.-NATO
ballistic missile defense system is even more threatening to
Russia than NATO’s eastward expansion.

“I’ll use this opportunity to say a few words about our
talks on missile defense,” Putin said. “This issue has no less,
and probably even more importance, than NATO’s eastward
expansion… At the expert level, everyone understands very well
that, if these systems are deployed closer to our borders, our
ground-based strategic missiles will be within their striking
range… If they deploy these elements in Europe, we’ll have to
do something in response, as we’ve said so many times… We’ll do
everything to guarantee the security of the Russian people, and
I’m sure we’ll succeed.”

LaRouche took note of these developments, and concluded his
discussion with associates this morning by stating: “This is what
goes on the record as of now, as spoken, here, at this point.
That defines what we’re saying is the issue of war, as of now.
We now recognize, we are a factor in this process. And what I’m
doing is a factor in this process of determining peace and war
issues.”

This entry was posted in Lyndon LaRouche, Stopping WW III and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.