LaRouche: Colored Revolutions “Illegal Warfare Under International Law & Federal Constitution”

LaRouche: Colored Revolutions “Illegal Warfare Under International Law & Federal Constitution”
In a webcast on Friday June 6, 2014, Lyndon LaRouche called for the impeachment of Barack Obama for continuing to conduct war as did Bush and Cheney on behalf of the British Empire under the cover of the so-called Color Revolutions and the so-called Arab Spring. This policy, enunciated by Tony Blair, in 1999 in a speech in Chicago, and initiated following the British Empire/Saudia Arabia orchestrated 9/11 attack on the United States, was explicitly denounced by Russian and Belarusian military speakers including Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, Russian Chief of Staff Valery Gerasimov, and Vladimir Zarudnitsky, head of Operations for the Russian General Staff, and Belarusian Defense Minister Yury Zhadobin at the May 23 Moscow Security Conference.Zarudnitsky explicitly said: “Colored revolutions are a new technique of aggression, geared towards destroying a state from within.” In an interview on French TV prior to the celebration of the anniversary of D-Day, Putin himself pointed to the fact that Europe and the United States are supporting an anti-constitutional armed coup in Ukraine which unleashed chaos and violence right on Russia’s border and that the same type of operation is being attempted in Syria.

LaRouche emphasized in the webcast that this policy has been “going on in Northern Africa, in games with the Saudis, in games with terrorists, or Blair’s operation in setting up the Iraq war, which was an unlawful war, a violation of everything by the British monarchy, the British Empire.”

In comments on Saturday, June 7, LaRouche stressed that 9/11 was actually a “color revolution” directed at the United States. The purpose of this attack on the part of the British Empire and its Saudi Arabian ally was to turn the United States into the instrument for launching perpetual warfare under the doctrines of “limited sovereignty,” “responsibility to protect” and “humanitarian intervention.” The ultimate aim of that policy is to reduce the world’s population, i.e. genocide, hardly humanitarian.

In his speech in Chicago before the Economic Club on April 22, 1999, Blair put forward the British Empire policy of so-called “humanitarian intervention” in violation of the principle of “non-interference” in the sovereign affairs of another nation-state as was established by the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648.

In a later speech on March 5, 2004, i.e. after 9/11, Blair was even more explicit:

“So, for me, before Sept. 11, I was already reaching for a different philosophy in international relations from a traditional one that has held sway since the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648; namely, that a country’s internal affairs are for it, and you don’t interfere unless it threatens you, or breaches a treaty, or triggers an obligation of alliance.”

In addition to violating the U.S. Constitution, this policy is also in direct violation of Article 2 of the UN Charter which says: “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.”

It also merits prosecution under the principle established by the Nuremberg Tribunal that it is a war crime and a crime against humanity to wage aggressive war.

And yet this is the policy which the Bush/Cheney administration carried out against Iraq under the influence of Blair’s lies about weapons of mass destruction. It is also the policy under which Obama has carried out the intervention to overthrow Qaddafi in Libya and has attempted to overthrow Assad in Syria. It is also the doctrine under which Bush/Cheney tortured suspected terrorists and Obama has murdered innocent civilians and even American citizens in Yemen, Pakistan and Afghanistan through drone attacks. It is also the doctrine under which Obama carried out a Nazi coup in Ukraine.

In the name of humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect, also vehemently espoused by the witches who immediately control Obama, including Susan Rice, Samantha Powers, and Valerie Jarrett, the United States under Obama has allied with al-Qaeda terrorists in Libya and Syria and with Nazis in Ukraine.

As LaRouche stressed in his webcast, “the war has been going on, but it’s not called a war. Well, for example, let’s take the case of what happened just now recently, in terms of the Ukraine policy. The Ukraine policy is actually under the control of people with Nazi backgrounds.”

Since the Bush, Jr. administration, but also totally under the Obama Administration the United States has been conducting warfare — actual warfare — warfare that violates the Constitution and committing crimes against humanity.

“What they’ve been using is what they call ‘guerrilla warfare.’ And under the name of gangsters and guerrilla warfare types of operation, they’ve moved in on various countries. For example: All of the Saudi operations of international terrorism were done under the British direction. For example, 9/11 was a British Empire operation. Bush and Cheney organized and supported and concealed the fact that there was a warfare operation being run by the British Empress, under her supervision all the way through.

“Now, Tony Blair’s operation, for the Queen, in organizing an Iraq war that was illegal. It is a fraud against the nations. What’s happening now, is that Obama is the patsy. It’s actually the Queen who runs the thing. But Obama’s been the patsy whose been running, in the name of the United States, support for operations which are actually warfare. In other words, what Obama has been doing, in his meddling in Europe with military operations, is a violation of the Constitution per se. They’re conducting war. What was done in Iraq: the same kind of thing, the precedent. Northern Africa: same precedent. It was actually warfare directed by the United States, in violation of the Constitution.

“Now, the question is: When are there enough patriots in the United States in power in government, who will actually say, ‘This is illegal warfare under international law, and it’s also illegal under the Federal Constitution. The President of the United States cannot conduct war without the approval of the Congress. Cannot be done.’ But it’s being done all the time, especially by Obama. But Cheney was doing the same thing! Cheney was the guy who organized the cover-up of 9/11.”

The color of the revolution launched in the United States with 9/11 was “green.” This is the Queen’s policy to reduce the world’s population from 7 to 1 billion human beings. This is also the policy which Tony Blair implicitly enunciated in his 1999 Chicago speech.

In his webcast, LaRouche stated: “If you know history and you go back to the cases of the Zeus-versus-Prometheus issue, and trace that history, which comes from a Greek drama and account. But this was what the Roman Empire was! This was what the mass execution of Christians was, by the Roman Empire. This is the British Empire. The British Empire was modeled on the Roman Empire.

“So, we’re dealing with an imperial force of a quality which has always been called ‘satanic.’ In other words, ‘Zeus’ is a Greek name for Satan. The Roman Empire was a satanic institution. The mass killing of Christians certainly defines it as a very evil force—a satanic force. The British Empire is also a satanic force. And this is the reality. The green policy in the United States: It’s a satanic program, created by the British Empress herself. The green policy is a mass-murderous scheme against the people of the United States. The attempt to cut down carbon now, is a mass-murderous project. Who’s doing it? Obama. Who is he doing it for? Well, the Queen wrote the recipe, and gave the orders.

“The question is: Does the United States have the moral fitness to survive? Now, the test is, if it has the moral fitness to survive, it is going to do, 1) immediately dump Obama; dump him, and impeach him. He’s fully impeachable. He’s more than impeachable.

“We can’t wait until the next term of office; we have to have certain things now, because we’re in a bail-in creation. You know what bail-in is? Bail-in is a time when the banks don’t give you interest, they take interest away from you, and they do it on the basis of their method of speculation. So, they speculate you down. The drain the United States of every resource. They eliminate the U.S. population, by bail-in. And bail-in is already in process. And if we don’t get Obama out of office soon, most of you citizens out there are going to be dead, probably this year.
Obama Running Warfare Operations Which Violate Constitution
Obama Running Illegal Warfare As Patsy For The British Empire
Watch full video of LaRouche’s webcast: larouchepac.com/node/30990


———————————————————————————————————————

— BACKGROUND —

Russia Identifies ‘Colored Revolutions’ As Aggressive Warfare At Moscow Security Conference

On May 23, 2014, the annual Moscow Security Conference was held in which speakers from the top levels of the Russian military command declared that they view so-called colored revolutions to be a new type of aggressive war, identifying the foreign-promotion of such revolutions to be a “new technique of aggression” deployed with the geopolitical intent to deliberately destabilize countries which occupy “an important strategic position and conduct an independent foreign policy” in order to cause “a major shift in the balance of power in a particular region,” targetting not only Russia, but also China as well as the Middle East, Africa, Central Asia, and South Asia.

Anthony Cordesman of CSIS (Center for Strategic & International Studies), who attended the May 23 Moscow Security Conference, posted 52 pages of his raw notes, with power-point slides included, to the CSIS site under the title, “Russia and the Color Revolution: A Russian Military View of a World Destabilized by the U.S. and the West (Key Briefs).”
Summary Report on Moscow Security Conference


Putin Denounces West’s Promotion of “Anti-Constitutional Armed Coup” in Ukraine, Support for Terrorists in Syria

In an exclusive interview with Europe-1 and TF-1, on June 4, 2014, Russian President Vladimir Putin repeatedly denounced Obama and others in Western Europe for promoting an “anti-constitutional armed coup” in Ukraine in order to topple the previous government, posing a direct threat to Russia including the movement of NATO military infrastructure right up to Russia’s border. Putin returned to this point several times throughout the interview, repeatedly using the phrase “anti-constitutional armed coup” as promoted by the United States and Europe. Putin also addressed the support for known al-Qaeda terrorists in the attempts to impose regime change against Bashar al-Assad in Syria, warning that regime change strategy threatens to “turn Syria into another Afghanistan, a completely uncontrollable spawning ground for the terrorist threat, including for European countries.”
Putin: U.S. & Europe Supported Anti-Constitutional Coup in Ukraine


From The Archives: British Empire’s “Color Revolution” Coups Target Russia

The following two articles, which appeared in the Jan. 20 and Feb. 3 editions of EIR Online magazine, respectively, provide the essential documentation on the British Empire’s spawning of the “color revolution” strategy, which has been implemented by “democracy” thinktanks and other irregular warfare operatives throughout the world. They have been slightly abridged.

Note that the major players in the direct anti-Russia operations described here have also been in the center of the Ukraine operation—notably, British money-bags George Soros, and British-trained National Endowment for Democracy head Nadia Diuk.
Bankrupt British Empire Keeps Pushing To Overthrow Putin
Destabilizing Russia: The ‘Democracy’ Agenda of McFaul & His Oxford Masters

by Rachel Douglas

Jan. 22—Two centuries ago, Russia and the young United States entered the dread year of 1812, each in peril of annihilation. We Americans were about to be assaulted along our East Coast by the British, who would seize and burn Washington, D.C., while the Anglo-Venetian creature Napoleon marched on Moscow. At that time, our ambassador at St. Petersburg was a universal thinker, an astronomer, a rhetorician, one of our outstanding statesmen and future greatest Presidents, John Quincy Adams. In Count Nikolai Rumyantsev, the commerce minister, foreign minister, and chancellor to His Imperial Majesty Alexander I of Russia, Adams, during his 1809-14 posting, found an interlocutor of likewise broad interests, and a crucial shared one: awareness of the British Empire as the common enemy of the United States and Russia.

Today we are all the more in need of such a high quality of diplomatic representation, as the financial powers and geostrategists of the collapsing Trans-Atlantic system, descended from that same British Empire of 200 years ago, threaten to plunge the world into a dark age of depopulation and war—a thermonuclear war that would wipe out civilization.

Instead, Barack Obama this month sent to Moscow as the new U.S. ambassador, one Michael McFaul, who has pursued a narrow ideological agenda throughout his career. It is not an American agenda, but a British one: the cynical cultivation of “democratic” movements for geopolitical purposes, all the way up to and including the overthrow of governments deemed uncooperative with recent decades’ globalization agenda. That has been the design of Project Democracy from its outset in the 1970s-1980s.[fn2] The Oxford background of leading figures like McFaul and National Endowment for Democracy (NED) vice president Nadia Diuk dramatizes the British connection, while they themselves openly state what it is they are up to.

Read the full PDF here.

This entry was posted in Stopping WW III and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.