Tune in tonight at 8pm for our weekly Friday webcast. As the stress tests in Europe reveal the utter bankruptcy of the entire transatlantic financial system, typified by Deutsche Bank and Monte dei Paschi in Italy, the urgency of initiating an entirely new era is staring us in the face. Glass-Steagall is now the official policy of both major political parties in the United States, and is on the agenda among prominent institutions inside Europe as evidenced by the Handelsblatt endorsement last week—however, this is merely the critical first step. Lyndon LaRouche’s invocation of the legacy of Alfred Herrhausen is paradigmatic of the solution necessary, which is contained within his “Four Laws” for a revival of productivity and progress. These measures which must be taken now can only be understood if viewed as a single coherent conception, premised on the fundamental principle of economic science: man is a creator, and only man creates. The past is never a logical antecedent of the future, but rather the future is only the product of creative genius, as typified by Albert Einstein, Krafft Ehricke, or Johannes Kepler. Only by ushering in this new conception of mankind as axiomatic of the new paradigm among nations, can we address and resolve the root causes of the current crisis which are driving us ever nearer the outbreak of world war.
MATTHEW OGDEN: Good Evening! It’s July 29th, 2016. You’re joining us for our weekly webcast here from LaRouchePAC.com on Friday night. I’m joined in the studio today by Megan Beets; and joined via video by two members of our Policy Committee: Kesha Rogers, who’s joining us from Houston, Texas; as well as Rachel Brinkley, who’s joining us from Boston, Massachusetts.
I think we can certainly say that we are standing at the end of an old era. We have an entire paradigmatic system which is completely collapsing around us, and hopefully we can say that we are standing at the threshold of a new era. We’re staring in the face of a complete disintegration of the trans-Atlantic financial system. This could not be seen more clearly [than] by the fact that you have these so-called bank “stress tests” that are taking place today in all of the major European banks. The results of these stress tests are due out later this evening; however, as Mr. LaRouche [has] said, “You don’t need to test these banks. You know that the entire banking system is completely bankrupt.”
Two of these banks, most notably, have been receiving very wide coverage. One of them is Monte dei Paschi Bank, which is the largest and the oldest continually-functioning bank in the world, the largest bank in Italy, will almost certainly fail their stress test, along with virtually every other bank in Italy, which [all together] are reported to be holding between EU210-360 billion in non-performing debt, which could not possibly be bailed out by the bankrupt economy of Italy, or the EU for that matter.
On the other hand, you have the largest German bank, Deutsche Bank, which has been described by the IMF as the riskiest, most vulnerable bank in the entire system. We’ve been covering the bankruptcy of Deutsche Bank recently with the stunning statistics that the net profits of Deutsche Bank are now virtually down to almost zero, with a 97% collapse in just the last year of net profits being reported by Deutsche Bank. The derivatives exposure by Deutsche Bank is massive. Every single major bank in the world is tied in to Deutsche Bank as a counterparty. Were Deutsche Bank to go under, you would have a contagion far, far wider than September 2008. Just since Wednesday, Deutsche Bank shares have fallen by 8%. Merrill Lynch has now downgraded it, along with the Frankfurt [stock] Exchange.
As can be seen, either one of these banks could fail the stress test. Stress test, or no stress test, this entire system could go up in smoke at any given moment, and that alone could trigger a mass panic across the entire trans-Atlantic. It can’t be emphasized more. This is far, far worse than the situation we found ourselves in, on the eve of the Crash of 2008.
What has to be said is that this is the major driver behind the threat of world war at this time. As Helga LaRouche has emphasized repeatedly in the recent weeks, there is no guaranteed strategy to avoid such a war, other than addressing the root causes of this threat of world war, which is a complete systemic reorganization of the entire trans-Atlantic financial system. This is a top-down reorganization, in the way that Franklin Roosevelt did it in his first days in office as President of the United States.
The critical first step to this is, obviously, the restoration of the full Franklin Roosevelt  Glass-Steagall Act, not just in the United States, but throughout the entire trans-Atlantic region. This is actually the subject of the institutional question that we received for this broadcast tonight, which Mr. LaRouche had a short comment on. The question was: “Dear Mr. LaRouche, The call to reinstate Glass-Steagall is now included in the platforms of both the Republican and Democratic parties. In your view, how likely is it that Glass-Steagall will be enacted by Congress?” Mr. LaRouche said, “Obviously, we’re not banking on the likelihood. We have to make this happen. There is no other alternative. Whether or not Congress will act, is highly debatable, because there’s nothing predictable in this political system. What has to happen is a major movement, which we must lead, to force this measure through, which will induce certain realities to come to light — that is, the total bankruptcy of the system.”
Glass-Steagall, however, is only the first step. I think this is something which we have repeatedly said, but will be the subject of much of the discussion of our broadcast tonight. The type of initiative that Mr. LaRouche has taken, in the case of Deutsche Bank, the call for the return to the Alfred Herrhausen legacy, the last sane banker at Deutsche Bank, who was assassinated in cold blood on November 30, 1989, right at the critical moment of opportunity for the future of world history.
This type of action that Mr. LaRouche has called for — the intervention into Deutsche Bank — is paradigmatic of the type of thinking necessary. How does this apply today? This is the type of discussion which, I think, has become revived, with the concept of the Four Laws, Mr. LaRouche’s Four Laws for the reorganization of the financial system. This is not just a series of recipes, or a laundry-list of steps that must be taken, but rather, as people have recognized, the Four Laws, as conceived by Mr. LaRouche, is a single, coherent statement of principle which is premised on a single, fundamental truth of the real science of physical economics. That single, fundamental premise is that mankind is a species like no other. Mankind is completely unique among all other living things, in that only mankind has the ability to create entirely new modes of existence that had no antecedent, no derivative effect from past experience, but an entirely new mode of behavior. Only man has the ability to willfully create the future.
This absolutely unique character of mankind is typified in a very distilled and profound form by some very significant personalities within the living memory of many people who are living today: Albert Einstein, for one; and the great visionary space scientist, Krafft Ehricke, as another. I think that will carry us into the remainder of our discussion here and sort of set a framework. But I’ll just reiterate: I think that with confidence that we can say, “This old system is dead, and our responsibility is to bring mankind onto the threshold of an entirely new era.”
KESHA ROGERS: I think that is absolutely the starting point of what is the new paradigm that we must bring into existence at this present moment. The discussions we’ve had with Mr. LaRouche on the conceptions presented by his “Four Laws to Save the United States”, are absolutely pertinent, because these Four Laws represent a move away from monetarism and probabilities of what is acceptable or presentable for the future based on numbers and statistics.
We’re not waiting on the numbers and statistics and on the horoscopes to tell us what that future is going to be. We actually must live in that future and create that future. That has been the unique role of Mr. LaRouche and his uniqueness in forecasting economics. He’s not just talking about something that can be brought into existence based on figures that are already presented to you, but that the numbers have to be thrown out. We’re not waiting on the figures of the IMF or the stress tests or anything like this. The Four Laws represent a new direction for mankind that we now have to act to bring the future into existence. If you’re going to do that, that means you have to live in the future.
I was thinking and very struck by Mr. LaRouche’s works going back to his Presidential campaign in 1988. At that time, it’s very pertinent to what is necessary for thinking about the future existence which we have to create, now, once and for all, that during that time, he presented in a TV broadcast called The Woman on Mars a vision for thirty-nine years from then, looking at the future in 2027 AD. [It opens with] the voice of a woman from Mars saying, “I have the announcement for which you have been waiting. As of five minutes ago, our environmental systems were fully stabilized. Man’s first permanent colony on Mars is now completely operational.” Mr. LaRouche comes on and he says, “Many of you are shocked. Some of you are saying, ‘Why is this old geezer taking about a permanent colony on Mars, 39 years from now, with the major budget problems in Washington today?’|”
At that point in time, what he was actually presenting, was the greatest economic recovery plan for the nation and the world. That is what these Four Laws today represent. They’re not just Glass-Steagall, or something based on the current trends of monetary policy; they go outside of the current trends of thinking, into a new domain of human existence that has not yet been created. I think that that is very important, because that’s what we’ve lost sight of. In this day and age, too many people are living their lives based on their current state of existence — what they think is possible. You know, “Am I going to survive, day to day? Where am I going to get my food from? How am I going to pay my next light bill?” And so forth.
That is not the new paradigm that you want to live in. You want to actually be thinking about creating that future. This is the unique role that Mr. LaRouche’s life and his contributions to true human economy have played, and the very critical role that great visionary scientists such as Krafft Ehricke, have really brought into existence.
The fact of the matter is that, as you said, Matt, the current era of this British Empire, of this anti-growth system, is coming to an end. This monetary policy is not going to be the determining factor of the future. What is, is going to be the creative mind of man, unlike any other [species] to actually determine and act to bring about that future. Right now, none of the current existing trends, election process, candidates, or monetary policy mean one thing whatsoever in terms of the real universe that we live in.
I think that that’s what we really have to get across to people; that people don’t need to live discouraged about “Oh, what is life going to bring me? Am I going to be dealt a bad hand or a good hand?” Well, you better figure out what that hand is going to be, and determine it for yourself!
OGDEN: One thing I wanted to just pick up on, what you said, Kesha. The idea of “willful action” is something which is inherent in the concept of the American republic. Citizens are not subjects. Just as we are not subjects of a king or a queen, which was the consequence of the American Revolution, we’re also not subjects of some hidden hand, “invisible hand” of fate or economics or statistics. This has been a problem in our population, where people have given up hope that their actions can actually have a meaning. So, it’s the decision to willfully create a future, and say “Despite the fact that the entire system — politically, socially, economically, financially — is crumbling around you, you have the presence of an entirely different system which has already come into existence; has already materialized on this planet.” The most populous nations in the world are now leading that New Paradigm.
We have news that Helga Zepp-LaRouche, president of the international Schiller Institute, has been a featured guest at a very important conference that happened in China just this week. This is the T-20 conference, or so-called “Think 20”, which is happening in the context of the G-20; it’s a sort of think tank of private sector representatives from around the world. And it was co-sponsored by the Chinese Academy for Social Sciences — actually a representative of that think tank spoke at the recent Schiller Institute conference that happened in Berlin; Ren Lin, on the subject of the One Belt, One Road policy. But Helga LaRouche’s presentation was to say that we need to now take the concept of the One Belt, One Road — the New Silk Road idea — and expand this to the entire planet. This is the foundation for a New Paradigm of thinking, a New Paradigm of international relations, and a new idea of mankind’s role in the Universe. It’s founded on the win-win concept which is fundamentally different than what has reigned over the last 100 years virtually, as British imperial, winner-take-all kind of thinking. So, the fact that this now exists as an option for mankind, is not an accident; this is the result of willful action that was taken by Helga LaRouche and Lyndon LaRouche at the time that the Soviet Union collapsed, to put this option on the table. This is the direct outgrowth of what was proposed at that time when Alfred Herrhausen was picking up on this idea of the Productive Triangle; using the reindustrialization of Eastern Europe, the former Soviet space, as the driver, as the engine for a revival of the great economic powerhouse of the German economy and the rest of Western Europe. This was expanded to the Eurasian Land-Bridge; and now exists in actuality — not just as future potential, but as actuality — in the form of this New Silk Road idea.
And the American people could so easily say, “We reject this system which is being forced upon us with both of these failed parties; and we are now going to say, ‘We insist that our nation is going to become a member of this New Paradigm of relations among nations.’ And we will build the New Silk Road across the Bering Strait into the United States, and down into the entirety of the Western Hemisphere.”
BRINKLEY: Just to follow up on this discussion, Mr. LaRouche was discussing with us yesterday the question of the development of mankind; as Kesha was really emphasizing. As we come right to the end of this system, what is missing? A lot of people will say there’s a problem; [but] it’s beyond a problem, this is a total systemic breakdown. So what is missing? LaRouche really pointed to Einstein in particular and said, “For Einstein, he didn’t use numbers to measure the Universe.” He said, “The creative powers of mankind are located in the same kind of thing Einstein used to measure the Universe.” If he didn’t use numbers, what did he use? This is a question where the same question is, where does a new idea come from? What Einstein generated, no one had thought before him; so where did he come up with the means to make that hypothesis? Something that, based on all human sense perception in previous human existence, no one had ever perceived anything that would tell them this concept, this new idea that Einstein generated. Where did he come up with it from? It’s really the idea of getting rid of the standards of measurement that were used generally by empiricism, by sense perception, by describing the Universe via senses. Einstein said, I want to get beyond this and see what unifies these things; he used a principle of the Universe itself to measure. In so doing, he created a whole new level of power for mankind.
So, this came from his mind; there wasn’t even the ability to perceive what he hypothesized. To test it experimentally did not even exist at the time; it’s now being proven true 100 years later. But this shows that the power of a human economy really doesn’t come from the external sources people would think about it. It obviously doesn’t come from money; it doesn’t come from petroleum; it doesn’t come from helium-3; it doesn’t come from nuclear fuel. The power of an economy doesn’t come from these objects; it comes from the new discovery generated in a mind to utilize this new power. This obviously is what has been attacked. It was also the idea of Nicholas of Cusa, who generated the Renaissance; that is the quality of thinking we need now.
Not business as usual, as you see at the Democratic or Republican conventions; we don’t need to debate minimum wage or something like that. We’ve discussed what the problem is with this discussion of minimum wage. Even if you pay people more, do they have the ability to purchase the goods they need to survive? Are the goods even there, available to be purchased? Healthcare — it’s not there; transportation — no, it’s completely falling apart. Our nation is really a disgrace compared to what’s happening in Asia right now. I think China’s building over 100 nuclear plants in the next 10 years; while we’ve just shut down about 4. There’s more that could be said, but maybe for now we should just open up the discussion; but I just also want to bring up again a Krafft Ehricke quote. He also recognized the moment of change that mankind was in, even back in the 1970s, when we began to really adopt this environmentalist empiricism, lack of science, lack of intention towards growth. He said, “To cease growing means to make the grim past the future’s only option.” That’s what we’re living today; we’re living the grim past. What he also said is that no growth goes with tension, it goes with conflict, and it goes with war. I think if people look around at the state of conflict on the planet, it’s pervasive; this is a result of this lack of a sense of progress, and lack of a sense of mission.
So, I’ll just leave it at that; we can discuss it more.
MEGAN BEETS: Well, just to pick up, Rachel, on what you were just discussing, and also Kesha was pointing to in the fundamental principle underlying Mr. LaRouche’s Four Laws; which is the fundamental distinction of the human mind from all other forms of existence. I think it can be seen in the personality of Einstein, as you were saying Rachel; I think it can also be seen in the insights and the actions of Kepler. Kepler said, in a very provocative letter to a patron of his, he said, “Not every hunch is wrong. For man is in the image of the Creator, and it’s very possible that in matters which pertain to the organization of the Universe, man thinks like the Creator.” And I think that really does get to what Einstein was able to do, and Kepler himself did this with that principle as a foundation, generating from his mind a notion unique to his mind, of the principle which was organizing and governing our Solar System. It was a completely new idea; he had never observed anything that clued him into this. This was a completely new notion; he discovered the principle of universal gravitation and completely revolutionized the powers of mankind. Mankind now lived in a new Universe. That’s the basis of economics.
And I think it does get exactly to what Mr. LaRouche has been saying in the face of the collapse of this financial system. Nothing that would be attempted now to save the system — no bail-out measures, no bail-in measures, none of this will work; you cannot save an inherently valueless system. You have to reorganize it upon the true principle of the source of value, which is the human mind’s ability to discover new principles which create a new species. And that’s why you, Kesha, obviously know this first-hand; that’s the importance of the space program. That’s the importance of declaring that the space program is the number one commitment of the nation; to actually put this challenge to man’s mind to go right up to the new frontier to discover what we have not yet discovered in the forefront. That then as the boundary, then reorganizes all the other relationships within your economy. We saw a hint of that in the 1960s, under the influence of people like Krafft Ehricke with our space program here; although that was shut down. Now, with the crumbling of this British Empire system, we have the opportunity — but also a very real responsibility with people who are around Mr. LaRouche and get this principle — to insure that this is the direction humanity goes in now; this is not a foregone conclusion.
OGDEN: I liked this quote that was featured in what we have as the lead to the LaRouche PAC website today; a quote from Krafft Ehricke, I believe from a paper he wrote in 1966 — I might be wrong. He is discussing the thrill of what it felt like to be standing on the threshold of a new era; recognizing when they first launched the successful launch of the most rudimentary, basic rocket, that this new era of rocket science was carrying mankind off of the planet. Or had the potential to carry mankind off of the planet Earth and to open up an entirely new evolutionary moment, phase for the human species. He compared it to Columbus discovering the New World; it actually reminded me of that poem “On First Looking into Chapman’s Homer” by Keats, where he describes the awe of Cortez standing on the cliffs of Darien and looking at the Pacific. The first European who had seen the Pacific Ocean from crossing over the territory of North America. He also used the comparison of the astronomer who is the first to discover a new planet coming across the sky. So that thrill of discovery, not just the personal act of discovery of something new; but the recognition that this is a transformative moment for the human species, and that this is what makes us human. It’s those discontinuous moments from the previous state to the future state, which have no logical consequence one from the other; but that moment, that transition, is the moment of humanity. And that’s what separates us from the animals. Krafft Ehricke’s description of that was the roar of those engines, the recognition that mankind was about to become a space-faring creature; and it was the experience of what it means to be human itself.
ROGERS: And yes, once again, living in the future; creating the future. Remember, Krafft Ehricke writing in 1966, looking back from the year 2000; he died in 1984. This was a vision that was being brought into existence that had not yet happened; but was in the mind of Krafft Ehricke as a living principle, as a living idea. Now, as you said earlier, Matt, that vision is now being brought into reality by the New Paradigm that’s being created by Russia, by China. It is the United States that now has no excuses not to join aboard and join with that New Paradigm that is already at our fingertips. It’s very fascinating to see. This is the economic recovery; this is the largest economic recovery program — the space program. It’s much greater than anything that even John F Kennedy thought about; Kennedy wasn’t the be all and end all with the Apollo missions, and he wasn’t going to stop there. He had a greater vision; just as Krafft Ehricke, just as LaRouche, based on a human economy. And this idea of the imagination and what was created in the mind of Krafft Ehricke with the colonies [on the Moon], the nuclear power systems, the development of fusion economies and helium-3 systems on Mars and Venus and other places. This is the basis of a real economy; a human economy from that standpoint. It’s very much what our conception and idea has to be based on. And that’s the Four Laws; that’s the principle of the Four Laws that we really have to get across to people.
It’s good that Glass-Steagall is being implemented in both parties’ platforms; but now what are people willing to do? Are you still going to accept the policy economically of zero growth? Are you still going to accept the policy of fascism, of war? What does Glass-Steagall mean when you actually are going along with this insane policy; when you’re not thinking about your children’s and your grandchildren’s futures?
OGDEN: One thing that came out of the Schiller Institute Berlin conference that we’ve been discussing — it was about a month ago if not more now — Helga LaRouche keynoted it, obviously, and said, Look, we’re at a time in history where an entirely new principle of action is operating; it’s a principle of history which is not understood by most people. She characterized it as the Erinyes, or the principle of nemesis; where all of the failed axioms that have been enforced over the last decades in a system which is now crumbling in on itself, are taking down the very people who enforced those failed axioms. This was seen with Tony Blair with the release of the Chilcot Report; the major victory with the release of the 28 pages, which is something which goes back even before 9/11 to Mr. LaRouche’s broadcast in 1999 of the “Storm Over Asia” broadcast. This made very clear that there was a very high-level nefarious apparatus that was being run by the Anglo-Saudi nexus, using these mercenary forces for irregular warfare against countries around the world.
Now, you see that playing out; and I think it’s very significant that there’s been a drastic shift in the situation on the ground in Syria. Aleppo, which was actually the subject of a video presentation which was shown at that Schiller Institute, it’s one of the most ancient cities; a UNESCO World Heritage site. It was the crossroads of the old Silk Road; it’s situated right in between the three continents. Aleppo had obviously been held by these terrorists for years; and the action in just the last days by the Syrian government with the back-up of the Russian air force, stationed at Latakia, to be able to come in and begin liberating that city of Aleppo in the same way that Palmyra was liberated, is a real turning point in the war on the ground against the outgrowth of this very mercenary Army-type of irregular force that Mr. LaRouche was warning about all the way back in 1998-99.
Again, the role that Vladimir Putin is playing in this regard, is a critical role. I kind of want to link these two things together a little bit. Mr. LaRouche’s prescription for how Europe could possibly survive this entire blow-out of these completely over-leveraged banks and the disintegration of the political situation itself with the aftermath of the Brexit, was that there needs to be a close collaboration between Germany and Putin in Russia. What Putin is doing in Russia is the pathway forward for Europe. An entire integration of the Asian Economic Union, the New Silk Road, and what remains of the mittelstand, or the industrial sector of Germany, which is viable.
As you’re looking at this complete meltdown, this complete disintegration which could come within days or hours, of Deutsche Bank — the biggest bank in Germany; Monte dei Paschi, the oldest bank in Italy; action must be taken in the very short term. Not just from the standpoint of stabilizing a collapsing financial system and transforming it into an entirely new system of economics; but also as a critical war avoidance measure. If these steps are not taken, and Germany is allowed to disintegrate under the weight of a collapsing Deutsche Bank, for example; there will be no pathway forward for the kind of collaboration between sane factors in Germany for example, and what Putin is doing in Russia. And the force for stability and peace that Russia has represented will not — the access will not be there. So, I think you have to take all of this strategic picture together, and not separate any element of it; and be able to see it from the top down as Mr. LaRouche sees it, and say “Necessary actions must be taken to resolve the root crises, the root causes of the crises that we now face.”
I’ll stress again, this factor of what has been occurring inside of Syria, as these series of regime-change wars, this is the evidence of the breakdown of a system which is evil; a system which is creating the possibility for failed states across that region. This is driving millions of refugees out of their homelands into Europe; it cannot be sustained. An entirely New Paradigm — it can’t be resolved piecemeal, which is the point. You can’t just say we’re going to address this situation here and address that situation there; but new axiomatic approaches to the entire concept of the system must be in place, and it must be premised on this central feature of what the Four Laws are a derivative of — which is this unique character of man to willfully create new modes of existence for the human species.
BRINKLEY: Any type of practical discussion as opposed to that, just needs to be gotten rid of. We really do need a quality of courage. It’s obvious out there right now what Obama has been doing in promoting and protecting terrorism. We now have the 28 pages out, and the Democrats are still kissing Obama’s butt; and the Republicans are going over to Trump. This is crazy, given the truth which has come out that one of our so-called allies, including the British Empire, attacked our nation in an act of war; and the President who covered that up is still being allowed to be President. So, this is the question of practicality; which is another symptom of this higher question involved in the discussion of the creation of new states. You have to be bold; you have to be able to take bold actions as well. One thing LaRouche said that was insightful about the practical man, he said, “The practical man created nothing but his own noise and fools who believed in his noise.” I think people can think of a few examples of that today; but definitely Wall Street for one. Anyone protecting Wall Street and anyone saying you’ve got to go along to get along with party politics or something like this; that’s all dead, that’s all obsolete at this moment.
OGDEN: Just returning to what Mr. LaRouche said about the actions that must be taken around Glass-Steagall, this is the result; the very fact that this is in both party platforms is the result of the leadership that I think both of you have represented over the course of the last almost decade. Both you, Rachel, and Kesha have run very prominent campaigns for Federal office; and the fact that Rachel, you took on Barney Frank and really refuted all of his arguments against Glass-Steagall on live television; this is what made this a household word. And then Kesha, your campaign around NASA in Texas was a transformative campaign; it was national in scope and international in its effects. The reason why we have the LaRouche PAC Policy Committee, which both Kesha and Rachel are representatives of, is that you do have the deliberative body existing in this country — represented not exclusively by members of the Policy Committee — but represented by the type of thinking that this Policy Committee has been able to achieve over the course of the last several years as public figures in your own right.
People must not despair; the belief in the kind of party politics and go along to get along pragmatism is what demoralizes people in this country. But every time the kind of leadership which Rachel and Kesha represented in their campaigns is exhibited, you see the American people wake up, just light up. Because that’s reminiscent of the kind of leadership that used to be quintessentially American: John F Kennedy; Robert Kennedy; what Franklin Roosevelt was able to do to draw people from the depths of not just an economic depression, but a widespread emotional depression that had taken hold of the American people in the aftermath of the ’29 stock market crash. And to pull those people up and to turn that generation into the most productive generation that this country had ever seen, that should be enough to give us confidence that through the bold and assertive implementation of the principles behind these Four Laws, not just the words in the effect, but the principles which these are hinged upon; rooted deep within the American System ideas of Alexander Hamilton. Through the application of this, we could see — this generation of Americans could actually see themselves as becoming once again the most productive, most optimistic, most creative generation that this country has ever seen; in collaboration with what’s coming out of China in that regard and all of the other countries that have been touched by this vision.
So, it’s not abstract that we’re discussing the figures of Krafft Ehricke or Albert Einstein; who themselves were critical personalities in the context of what Franklin Roosevelt was accomplishing or what John F Kennedy was accomplishing. It was that spark of creative optimism which, coming from a few individual geniuses such as that, actually lit the fires of optimism and creativity throughout the entirety of the American people. That can be done again.
ROGERS: Yes, and all these figures who you just named, who at a very young age, dedicated their lives to a mission; just as LaRouche did. And right now, we’re recruiting people to our team; we need the young people to actually take responsibility and dedicate their lives to this very mission of acting to shape the future. Because the reality is, the people who are being strongly affected by this destructive policy under Obama and Bush that we’ve been seeing for far too long, are particularly the young people. They have to not accept this; and they have to make the determination that they’re going to be a part — as others throughout the nation and the world — of shaping and bringing about the future that they want to see.
OGDEN: Megan mentioned the person of Johannes Kepler. This was Einstein’s inspiration; he wrote this paper on the 400th anniversary of the death of Johannes Kepler. It was exactly Kepler’s ability that nobody else had seen; or to see the Universe from an angle which nobody else had even attempted to see it from, was the type of thinking that Albert Einstein practiced as almost a religious devotion. It’s the ability to say, “No; mankind does have the ability not to look up at the world from the standpoint of the animals that crawl on the ground, but to look down at the Universe through the eyes of the Creator.” To be seeing the world through the eyes of the Creator means to see the infinite potential; there is no limit in terms of what’s possible in terms of growth and potential in a creative Universe. You can guarantee that a Creator of that Universe, who does not live in time but lives outside of and above time — as Einstein himself was enabled to do; sees that that infinite potential is there. But it hinges on the willful ability of a species such as man to act to unlock that creative potential; to unlock the future. So, the vision and the faith that comes with that kind of way of thinking is what carries great geniuses such as Einstein, Kepler, Krafft Ehricke, others to be able to see the world from the standpoint of not the extrapolated future; but a future which nobody else have ever dreamed of existing.
Kesha, you might want to bring this up. You have mentioned earlier that there was this conference that took place in Germany, celebrating the legacy of Gottfried Leibniz and some of the remarks that were made there. Maybe that would be important.
ROGERS: Unfortunately, I don’t have those remarks right in front of me; maybe Megan does. This was a conference on the 370th birthday anniversary of Leibniz, that was being discussed today from developments that we heard of today. One of the representatives was a Chinese Leibniz scholar, and he was actually expressing the idea of Leibniz’s conception of happiness. Megan, do you have that there? Because I though it really encapsulates what we’ve been speaking of here.
BEETS: So this was a gentleman named Wenchao Li, who is from the University; he’s a China-born Leibniz specialist at the University of Hannover. He said, “For our own happiness, or the happiness of others, we can only be happy if others are happy, too. What it is about is human beings; other cultures. It is about the common good of all.” That was actually how they opened this conference commemorating Leibniz. I think it’s significant, because often times these conferences can be sort of insular and limited to a certain academic community. But this clearly reflects the principle of humanity that Leibniz represented; and it’s also clearly resonating with the potential of the New Paradigm today.
ROGERS: Over 400 scientists from around the world, and this is an expression of what the space program truly exemplifies; it is the expression of happiness, of an end to conflict, an end to wars, and a true expression of what it is to be truly human. Right now, if we’re going to put an end to the hostilities and war drive and so forth, the greatest basis that we have to do that is through cooperation in space exploration. That is the means of happiness that we can bring about to the existence of all mankind. I thought that that was clearly expressed in that quote and in the theme that was brought up in that conference.
BEETS: I think this really is the challenge to the American people. Everything we’ve been discussing is couched in how you opened, Matt, with the financial meltdown. What was brought up about the very real danger of the war being driven by the British Empire as their system comes apart. I think the challenge to the American people is the issue of courage; of realizing that what we’ve been discussing here today as the true nature of the human mind. That is reality; the Presidential election is not reality. Voting is not reality; it’s whether people have the guts today to admit LaRouche is right. And to stand and organize with us. And I think the call is put out to everyone to stand and organize with us now; now is the moment to bring this New Paradigm into existence in the United States, which is really the lynchpin in the entire global picture right now.
OGDEN: OK. That’s a conclusion that we can take as the final word here. I would like to ask everybody to please subscribe to the LaRouche PAC YouTube channel; there are actually two channels. This is the LaRouche PAC Live; there’s also a channel [called] LaRouche PAC videos, which has a lot more of the substantial, lengthy presentations that we’ve put together. So, if you haven’t subscribed to either one of those yet, please subscribe to both. This is really central to our ability to build the kind of mass movement of intellectual courage which will continue to place LaRouche PAC in the center of creating the vision for the future of the United States.
So, I’d like to thank you both, Kesha and Rachel, for joining us via video here today; and thanks to Megan for joining me in the studio. Thank you for tuning in. Please stay tuned and we’ll see you next Monday. Good night.